Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26538332›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2016

Dividing organelle tracks into Brownian and motor-driven intervals by variational maximization of the Bayesian evidence.

Matthew J Martin, Amanda M Smelser, George Holzwarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew J MartinDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Amanda M SmelserDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
George HolzwarthDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. gholz@wfu.edu.

Funding

Structural and Computational Biophysics Training ProgramT32GM095440 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOLLIS, THOMAS J, LYLES, DOUGLAS S. · 2011 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM095440NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM095440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many organelles and vesicles in live cells move in a start-stop manner when observed for ~10 s by optical microscopy. Changes in velocity and directional persistence of such particles are a potentially rich source of insight into the mechanisms leading to the start and stop states. Unbiased assessment of the most probable number of states, the properties of each state, and the most probable state for the particle at each moment can be accomplished by variational Bayesian methods combined with a hidden Markov model and a Gaussian mixture model. Our track analysis method, "vbTRACK", applied this combination of methods to particle velocity v or changes in the direction of travel evaluated from simulated tracks and from tracks of peroxisomes in live cells. When tested with numerical data, vbTRACK reliably determined the number of states, the mean and variance of the velocity or the direction of travel for each state, and the most probable state during each frame. When applied to the tracks of peroxisomes in live cells, some tracks separated into two states, one with high velocity and directionality, the other approximately Brownian. Other tracks of particles in live cells separated into several diffusive states with distinct diffusion constants.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalMotionBayes TheoremBiological TransportPeroxisomesGaussian mixture modelHidden Markov modelMean-squared-displacementParticle trackingVariational Bayes

Identifiers

PMID26538332
PMCPMC5125805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.