Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26538235›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2016

Renal nerves dynamically regulate renal blood flow in conscious, healthy rabbits.

Alicia M Schiller, Peter R Pellegrino, Irving H Zucker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The denervation or activation of renal sympathetic nerve and renal blood flow.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alicia M SchillerDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Peter R PellegrinoDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Irving H ZuckerDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska izucker@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of Excitatory Input into the PVN on Increased Sympathetic Drive in HeartP01HL062222 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CORNISH, KURTIS G · 1999 to 2019
$32.2M
Central Rho-Kinase Inhibition and Ang II-induced Sympatho-excitationF30HL118974 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PELLEGRINO, PETER RICCI · 2014 to 2016
$118k
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL118974NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL062222NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL62222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant clinical interest in renal denervation as a therapy, the role of the renal nerves in the physiological regulation of renal blood flow (RBF) remains debated. We hypothesized that the renal nerves physiologically regulate beat-to-beat RBF variability (RBFV). This was tested in chronically instrumented, healthy rabbits that underwent either bilateral surgical renal denervation (DDNx) or a sham denervation procedure (INV). Artifact-free segments of RBF and arterial pressure (AP) from calmly resting, conscious rabbits were used to extract RBFV and AP variability for time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear analysis. Whereas steady-state measures of RBF, AP, and heart rate did not statistically differ between groups, DDNx rabbits had greater RBFV than INV rabbits. AP-RBF transfer function analysis showed greater admittance gain in DDNx rabbits than in INV rabbits, particularly in the low-frequency (LF) range where systemic sympathetic vasomotion gives rise to AP oscillations. In the LF range, INV rabbits exhibited a negative AP-RBF phase shift and low coherence, consistent with the presence of an active control system. Neither of these features were present in the LF range of DDNx rabbits, which showed no phase shift and high coherence, consistent with a passive, Ohm's law pressure-flow relationship. Renal denervation did not significantly affect nonlinear RBFV measures of chaos, self-affinity, or complexity, nor did it significantly affect glomerular filtration rate or extracellular fluid volume. Cumulatively, these data suggest that the renal nerves mediate LF renal sympathetic vasomotion, which buffers RBF from LF AP oscillations in conscious, healthy rabbits.

Indexed as

Renal CirculationAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureHeart RateHomeostasisKidneyMaleModels, AnimalModels, CardiovascularNonlinear DynamicsRabbitsRenal ArterySympathectomySympathetic Nervous SystemTime Factorsdynamic autoregulationrenal blood flow variabilityrenal denervationrenal nerves

Identifiers

PMID26538235
PMCPMC4747893
OpenAlexW2124732332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.