ArticleHNO2015
[Tonsillectomy in adults: Length of hospital stay has no influence on the frequency of postoperative hemorrhage].
Article in HNO, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transoral Robotic Surgery in Chronic Lingual Tonsillitis: An Observational Cohort Study.Head & neck · 2025Observational
- Gender-specific risk factors in post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTonsillectomies (TE) in Germany are traditionally performed during inpatient hospital stays. Socioeconomic changes in the healthcare system have resulted in shorter hospital stays.
objectivesThe aim of the study was to investigate whether a shorter hospital stay of 2 days leads to increased postoperative bleeding after TE. Factors affecting the duration of hospitalization were also studied. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe relevant data of all patients (≥ 14 years) undergoing TE in the ENT Clinic of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, between 2011 and 2013 were recorded anonymously. Risk factors for bleeding after TE were analyzed. Additionally, patients who had a hospital stay of 2 days (since 2013) were compared with patients hospitalized for ≥ 3 days, and the influence of various risk factors on the length of hospital stay was analyzed.
resultsDuring the study period 2011-2013, 376 procedures were performed and data from 213 patients was collected for analysis. Median patient age was 26 years (range 14-73 years). The rate of primary hemorrhage (up to 24 hours after TE) was 2% and the rate of secondary bleeding (later than 24 hours) was 24%. In 7% of patients with postoperative haemorrhage (primary and secondary) surgical hemostasis was performed. Male gender was associated with a significantly higher haemorrhage rate. Shortening postdischarge surveillance to only 2 days did not affect the postoperative bleeding rate.
conclusionThe duration of stationary monitoring following TE should not only be based on the rate of secondary bleeding, but also on patient comfort and safety. A shortening of postoperative monitoring to only 2 days had no effect on the haemorrhage frequency after TE and can therefore, be considered for adults who do not live alone and are within a reasonable distance to a hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.