Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537925›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2016

Pressure-actuated microfluidic devices for electrophoretic separation of pre-term birth biomarkers.

V Sahore, S Kumar, C I Rogers, J K Jensen, M Sonker, A T Woolley

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V SahoreDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. sahore@byu.edu.
S KumarDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. kumarsuresh444@gmail.com.
C I RogersDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. chadirogers@gmail.com.
J K JensenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. jkj728@gmail.com.
M SonkerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. mukul.sonker89@gmail.com.
A T WoolleyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. atw@byu.edu.

Funding

Phase-Changing Sacrificial Layer Microfluidics for Enhanced Protein AnalysisR01EB006124 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI WOOLLEY, ADAM THOMAS · 2006 to 2016
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed microfluidic devices with pressure-driven injection for electrophoretic analysis of amino acids, peptides, and proteins. The novelty of our approach lies in the use of an externally actuated on-chip peristaltic pump and closely spaced pneumatic valves that allow well-defined, small-volume sample plugs to be injected and separated by microchip electrophoresis. We fabricated three-layer poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microfluidic devices. The fluidic layer had injection and separation channels, and the control layer had an externally actuated on-chip peristaltic pump and four pneumatic valves around the T-intersection to carry out sample injection. An unpatterned PDMS membrane layer was sandwiched between the fluidic and control layers as the actuated component in pumps and valves. Devices with the same peristaltic pump design but different valve spacings (100, 200, 300, and 400 μm) from the injection intersection were fabricated using soft lithographic techniques. Devices were characterized through fluorescent imaging of captured plugs of a fluorescein-labeled amino acid mixture and through microchip electrophoresis separations. A suitable combination of peak height, separation efficiency, and analysis time was obtained with a peristaltic pump actuation rate of 50 ms, an injection time of 30 s, and a 200-μm valve spacing. We demonstrated the injection of samples in different solutions and were able to achieve a 2.4-fold improvement in peak height and a 2.8-fold increase in separation efficiency though sample stacking. A comparison of pressure-driven injection and electrokinetic injection with the same injection time and separation voltage showed a 3.9-fold increase in peak height in pressure-based injection with comparable separation efficiency. Finally, the microchip systems were used to separate biomarkers implicated in pre-term birth. Although these devices have initially been demonstrated as a stand-alone microfluidic separation tool, they have strong potential to be integrated within more complex systems.

Indexed as

BiomarkersElectrophoresis, MicrochipEquipment DesignFemaleFerritinsHumansInfant, NewbornLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMalePeptidesPregnancyTerm BirthBiomarkersFerritinsPeptidesBioanalytical methodsCapillary electrophoresis/electrophoresisMicrofluidics/microfabrication

Identifiers

PMID26537925
PMCPMC4712090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.