Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537877›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2016

Identification of genomic biomarkers for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes: an in vitro repeated exposure toxicity approach for safety assessment.

Umesh Chaudhari, Harshal Nemade, Vilas Wagh, John Antonydas Gaspar, James K Ellis, Sureshkumar Perumal Srinivasan, Dimitry Spitkovski, Filomain Nguemo, Jochem Louisse, Susanne Bremer and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Predicting oncology drug-induced cardiotoxicity with donor-specific iPSC-CMs-a proof-of-concept study with doxorubicin.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cardiovascular Safety Assessment in Cancer Drug Development.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Umesh ChaudhariInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
Harshal NemadeInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
Vilas WaghInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
John Antonydas GasparInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
James K EllisBiomolecular Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sureshkumar Perumal SrinivasanInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
Dimitry SpitkovskiInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
Filomain NguemoInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
Jochem LouisseInstitute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
Susanne BremerInstitute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
Jürgen HeschelerInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
Hector C KeunBiomolecular Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jan G HengstlerLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Agapios SachinidisInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, NRW, Germany. a.sachinidis@uni-koeln.de.
University of Cologne · DEImperial College London · GBJoint Research Centre · ITLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The currently available techniques for the safety evaluation of candidate drugs are usually cost-intensive and time-consuming and are often insufficient to predict human relevant cardiotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to develop an in vitro repeated exposure toxicity methodology allowing the identification of predictive genomics biomarkers of functional relevance for drug-induced cardiotoxicity in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). The hiPSC-CMs were incubated with 156 nM doxorubicin, which is a well-characterized cardiotoxicant, for 2 or 6 days followed by washout of the test compound and further incubation in compound-free culture medium until day 14 after the onset of exposure. An xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analyser was used to monitor doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity while also monitoring functional alterations of cardiomyocytes by counting of the beating frequency of cardiomyocytes. Unlike single exposure, repeated doxorubicin exposure resulted in long-term arrhythmic beating in hiPSC-CMs accompanied by significant cytotoxicity. Global gene expression changes were studied using microarrays and bioinformatics tools. Analysis of the transcriptomic data revealed early expression signatures of genes involved in formation of sarcomeric structures, regulation of ion homeostasis and induction of apoptosis. Eighty-four significantly deregulated genes related to cardiac functions, stress and apoptosis were validated using real-time PCR. The expression of the 84 genes was further studied by real-time PCR in hiPSC-CMs incubated with daunorubicin and mitoxantrone, further anthracycline family members that are also known to induce cardiotoxicity. A panel of 35 genes was deregulated by all three anthracycline family members and can therefore be expected to predict the cardiotoxicity of compounds acting by similar mechanisms as doxorubicin, daunorubicin or mitoxantrone. The identified gene panel can be applied in the safety assessment of novel drug candidates as well as available therapeutics to identify compounds that may cause cardiotoxicity.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCardiotoxinsCells, CulturedComputational BiologyDaunorubicinDoxorubicinDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrugs, InvestigationalGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMitoxantroneMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCardiotoxinsDaunorubicinDoxorubicinDrugs, InvestigationalMitoxantroneTopoisomerase II InhibitorsCardiotoxicityGenomic biomarkersHeart failureHuman stem cells derived cardiomyocytesIn vitro test systemSafety assessmentTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID26537877
PMCPMC5065579
OpenAlexW2166714629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.