ArticleDer Anaesthesist2015
[Learning from a critical incident reporting system in the pediatric intensive care unit].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of simulation-based medical training in Swiss pediatric hospitals: a national survey.BMC medical education · 2017Article
- [Aus "Fehler und Gefahren" wird "Patientensicherheit" und aus "Trends und Medizinökonomie" wird "Qualitätsmanagement und Medizinökonomie"].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Article
- Interprofessional team management in pediatric critical care: some challenges and possible solutions.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo record and analyze critical incidents is of paramount importance for any organization dedicated to improving patient safety. Therefore, many hospitals have implemented a critical incident reporting system (CIRS). However, the impact, benefits and use of such CIRS systems on patient safety have often been reported to be unsatisfactory.
aimWhat have we learned over the past decade about the effective and optimal use of a CIRS? MATERIAL AND
methodsFollowing the Yorkshire contributory factors framework, the potential benefits of a CIRS are illustrated with selected examples from the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit. Based on a literature search in PubMed from January 2000 to December 2014 this article also describes critical factors and concepts for the successful use of a CIRS.
resultsA positive mind-set towards errors, high psychological safety and the conviction that a CIRS can be beneficial are important factors to encourage individual healthcare personnel to report critical incidents and learn from errors. On the part of the organization, adequate resources of personnel, systematic analysis of the reported incidents as well as dissemination of the results and implementation of safety improvement strategies are critical factors for the effective use of a CIRS. All incidents with potential relevance for patient safety should be reported. The categorization of the reported incidents facilitates the analysis and identification of relevant conclusions. As an organization dedicated to improve patient safety we have to learn from errors as well as from successes.
conclusionThe successful use of a CIRS depends on the motivation of individual healthcare providers as well as on organizational features that encourage critical incident reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26537762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.