Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537725›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

A new primary dental care service compared with standard care for child and family to reduce the re-occurrence of childhood dental caries (Dental RECUR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Cynthia Pine, Pauline Adair, Girvan Burnside, Louise Robinson, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Sondos Albadri, Morag Curnow, Marjan Ghahreman, Mary Henderson, Clare Malies and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Participation of paediatric patients in primary dental care before and after a dental general anaesthetic.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia PineInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2BA, UK. c.m.pine@qmul.ac.uk.
Pauline AdairHealth Psychology and Behavioural Medicine Research Group, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK. Pauline.adair@strath.ac.uk.
Girvan BurnsideDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Institute of Translational Medicine, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK. g.burnside@liverpool.ac.uk.
Louise RobinsonR&D Department, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Mayo Building, 3rd Floor, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK. Louise.robinson@srft.nhs.uk.
Rhiannon Tudor EdwardsCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Ardudwy Hall, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK. r.t.edwards@bangor.ac.uk.
Sondos AlbadriSchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5PS, UK. Sondos.albadri@liverpool.ac.uk.
Morag CurnowNHS Tayside, Tweed Place, Perth, PH1 1TJ, UK. Morag.curnow@nhs.net.
Marjan GhahremanNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust, Tantallon House, Goodmayes Hospital Site, Barley lane, Essex, IG3 8XJ, UK. mghahreman@nhs.net.
Mary HendersonKent Community Health NHS Trust, Capital House, Jubillee Way, Faversham, Kent ME, 13 8GD, UK. Mary.henderson3@nhs.net.
Clare MaliesSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Community Dental Service, Dental Department, Pendleton Gateway, 1 Broadwalk, Salford, M6 5FX, UK. Clare.Malies@srft.nhs.uk.
Ferranti WongInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2BA, UK. f.s.l.wong@qmul.ac.uk.
Vanessa MuirheadInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2BA, UK. v.muirhead@qmul.ac.uk.
Sally Weston-PriceInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2BA, UK. s.weston-price@qmul.ac.uk.
Hilary WhiteheadSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Community Dental Service, Dental Department, Pendleton Gateway, 1 Broadwalk, Salford, M6 5FX, UK. Hilary.Whitehead@srft.nhs.uk.
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBBangor University · GBKent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBNHS Tayside · GBNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn England and Scotland, dental extraction is the single highest cause of planned admission to the hospital for children under 11 years. Traditional dental services have had limited success in reducing this disease burden. Interventions based on motivational interviewing have been shown to impact positively dental health behaviours and could facilitate the prevention of re-occurrence of dental caries in this high-risk population. The objective of the study is to evaluate whether a new, dental nurse-led service, delivered using a brief negotiated interview based on motivational interviewing, is a more cost-effective service than treatment as usual, in reducing the re-occurrence of dental decay in young children with previous dental extractions. METHODS/

designThis 2-year, two-arm, multicentre, randomised controlled trial will include 224 child participants, initially aged 5 to 7 years, who are scheduled to have one or more primary teeth extracted for dental caries under general anaesthesia (GA), relative analgesia (RA: inhalation sedation) or local anaesthesia (LA). The trial will be conducted in University Dental Hospitals, Secondary Care Centres or other providers of dental extraction services across the United Kingdom. The intervention will include a brief negotiated interview (based on the principles of motivational interviewing) delivered between enrollment and 6 weeks post-extraction, followed by directed prevention in primary dental care. Participants will be followed up for 2 years. The main outcome measure will be the dental caries experienced by 2 years post-enrollment at the level of dentine involvement on any tooth in either dentition, which had been caries-free at the baseline assessment. DISCUSSION: The participants are a hard-to-reach group in which secondary prevention is a challenge. Lack of engagement with dental care makes the children and their families scheduled for extraction particularly difficult to recruit to an RCT. Variations in service delivery between sites have also added to the challenges in implementing the Dental RECUR protocol during the recruitment phase.

trial registrationISRCTN24958829 (date of registration: 27 September 2013), Current protocol version: 5.0.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingAge FactorsAnesthesiaChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsDental AssistantsDental Care for ChildrenDental CariesDental Caries SusceptibilityHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Education as TopicPreventive Dentistry

Identifiers

PMID26537725
PMCPMC4634579
OpenAlexW2104832820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.