Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537635›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Computational exploration of a protein receptor binding space with student proposed peptide ligands.

Matthew D King, Paul Phillips, Matthew W Turner, Michael Katz, Sarah Lew, Sarah Bradburn, Tim Andersen, Owen M McDougal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew D KingDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Paul PhillipsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Matthew W TurnerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Biomolecular Sciences PhD Program, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Michael KatzDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Sarah LewDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Sarah BradburnDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Tim AndersenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Owen M McDougalDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, 83725.
Boise State University · US

Funding

VPS35 D620N inhibits autophagy through disrupted hyaluronic acid-CD44 signalingP20GM109095 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OXFORD, JULIA THOM · 2014 to 2023
$22.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational molecular docking is a fast and effective in silico method for the analysis of binding between a protein receptor model and a ligand. The visualization and manipulation of protein to ligand binding in three-dimensional space represents a powerful tool in the biochemistry curriculum to enhance student learning. The DockoMatic tutorial described herein provides a framework by which instructors can guide students through a drug screening exercise. Using receptor models derived from readily available protein crystal structures, docking programs have the ability to predict ligand binding properties, such as preferential binding orientations and binding affinities. The use of computational studies can significantly enhance complimentary wet chemical experimentation by providing insight into the important molecular interactions within the system of interest, as well as guide the design of new candidate ligands based on observed binding motifs and energetics. In this laboratory tutorial, the graphical user interface, DockoMatic, facilitates docking job submissions to the docking engine, AutoDock 4.2. The purpose of this exercise is to successfully dock a 17-amino acid peptide, α-conotoxin TxIA, to the acetylcholine binding protein from Aplysia californica-AChBP to determine the most stable binding configuration. Each student will then propose two specific amino acid substitutions of α-conotoxin TxIA to enhance peptide binding affinity, create the mutant in DockoMatic, and perform docking calculations to compare their results with the class. Students will also compare intermolecular forces, binding energy, and geometric orientation of their prepared analog to their initial α-conotoxin TxIA docking results.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyStudentsBinding SitesBiochemistryMolecular Docking SimulationPeptidesReceptors, Cell SurfacePeptidesReceptors, Cell Surfacecomputational chemistrycomputers in research and teaching

Identifiers

PMID26537635
PMCPMC5367464
OpenAlexW2156133874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.