Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537599›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT), a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after a second or subsequent episode of self-harm.

Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Elizabeth Graham, Amanda Farrin, Michelle Collinson, Paula Boston, Ivan Eisler, Sarah Fortune, Jonathan Green, Allan House, David Owens and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trajectories of parent criticism across treatment for youth self-harm.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evidence Base Update of Psychosocial Treatments for Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Youth.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra Wright-HughesLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. a.wright-hughes@leeds.ac.uk.
Elizabeth GrahamLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. e.h.graham@leeds.ac.uk.
Amanda FarrinLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. a.j.farrin@leeds.ac.uk.
Michelle CollinsonLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. M.Collinson@leeds.ac.uk.
Paula BostonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, LS2 9LJ, Leeds, UK. P.A.Boston@leeds.ac.uk.
Ivan EislerInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK. ivan.eisler@kcl.ac.uk.
Sarah FortuneLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, LS2 9LJ, Leeds, UK. S.A.Fortune@leeds.ac.uk.
Jonathan GreenAcademic Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. jonathan.green@manchester.ac.uk.
Allan HouseLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, LS2 9LJ, Leeds, UK. a.o.house@leeds.ac.uk.
David OwensLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, LS2 9LJ, Leeds, UK. D.W.Owens@leeds.ac.uk.
Mima SimicInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK. mima.simic@slam.nhs.uk.
Sandy TubeufLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, LS2 9LJ, Leeds, UK. S.Tubeuf@leeds.ac.uk.
Jane NixonLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. J.E.Nixon@leeds.ac.uk.
Christopher McCabeFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada. mccabe1@ualberta.ca.
Michael KerfootAcademic Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David CottrellLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, LS2 9LJ, Leeds, UK. d.j.cottrell@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Leeds · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Department of Health 07/33/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm is common in the community with a lifetime prevalence of 13 %. It is associated with an elevated risk of overall mortality and suicide. People who harm themselves are high users of public services. Estimates of the 1-year risk of repetition vary between 5 and 15 % per year. Currently, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of clinical interventions for young people who engage in self-harm. Recent reviews have failed to demonstrate any effect on reducing repetition of self-harm among adolescents receiving a range of treatment approaches. Family factors are particularly important risk factors associated with fatal and non-fatal self-harm among children and adolescents. Family therapy focuses on the relationships, roles and communication patterns between family members, but there have been relatively few studies of specifically family-focused interventions with this population. The Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT) Trial was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (grant no. 07/33/01) following a commissioned call for this research. METHODS/

designSHIFT is a pragmatic, phase III, multicentre, individually randomised, controlled trial comparing Family Therapy (FT) with treatment as usual (TAU) for adolescents aged 11 to 17 who have engaged in at least two episodes of self-harm. Both therapeutic interventions were delivered within the National Health Service (NHS) Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in England. Participants and therapists were, of necessity, aware of treatment allocation, but the researchers were blind to the allocations to allow unbiased collection of follow-up data. Primary outcome data (repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance 18 months post-randomisation) were collected from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC), augmented by directed searches of medical records at Acute Trusts. Secondary outcome data (including suicidal intent, depression, hopelessness and health economics) were collected at 12 and 18 months post-randomisation via researcher-participant interviews and by post at 3 and 6 months. DISCUSSION: SHIFT will provide a well-powered evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of Family Therapy for young people who have self-harmed on more than one occasion. The study will be reported in 2016, and the results will inform clinical practice thereafter.

trial registrationISRCTN59793150 . 26 January 2009.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorChild BehaviorAdolescentAge FactorsChildClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFamily TherapyFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID26537599
PMCPMC4634791
OpenAlexW2116079768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.