Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537590›Full record

Observational studyAlzheimer's research & therapy2015

Compression or expansion of dementia in Germany? An observational study of short-term trends in incidence and death rates of dementia between 2006/07 and 2009/10 based on German health insurance data.

Gabriele Doblhammer, Anne Fink, Stephanie Zylla, Frans Willekens

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dementia and Risks of Temperature-Related Mortality and Hospitalizations in Germany.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriele DoblhammerUniversity of Rostock, Institute for Sociology and Demography, Ulmenstr. 69, 18057, Rostock, Germany. gabriele.doblhammer-reiter@dzne.de.
Anne FinkGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn, Ludwig-Erhard-Allee, 53175, Bonn, Germany. anne.fink@dzne.de.
Stephanie ZyllaUniversity of Rostock, Institute for Sociology and Demography, Ulmenstr. 69, 18057, Rostock, Germany. stephanie.zylla@uni-greifswald.de.
Frans WillekensMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Konrad-Zuse-Str. 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany. willekens@demogr.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere have been recent reports about a decline in dementia incidence, but only little is known about trends in the mortality of patients with dementia. Only the simultaneous analysis of both trends can inform whether the reported decline in dementia has led to a compression of dementia into higher ages.

methodsWe used health claims data from the largest public health insurer in Germany over the two time periods 2004/07 and 2007/10. Dementia was defined according to the International Classification of Disease 10th revision (ICD-10) numbers G30, G31.0, G31.82, G23.1, F00, F01, F02, F03 and F05.1 or by a prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine or both. In the two time periods, we observed 502,065 person-years of exposure and 10,881 incident dementia cases and 10,013 person-years of exposure among the newly demented and 3049 deaths. We estimated the relative risks of the two time periods applying proportional hazard models and calculated years with or without dementia using the illness-death model.

resultsDementia incidence was significantly higher in 2006/07 than in 2009/10, whereas mortality with dementia tended to be lower in the first period, albeit statistically significant among women only. Mortality without dementia tended to be higher in the first period for men and remained stable for women. Combining these trends, we found that at age 65 remaining life years with dementia were compressed by a yearly 0.4 months for men and 1.4 months for women. At the same time, remaining life years without dementia increased by a yearly 1.4 months for men and 1.1 months for women.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that the increase in dementia-free life years went together with an absolute compression of life years with dementia. This positive trend was particularly strong among women. Results were controlled for trends in multi-morbidity and care need, suggesting that the postponement in dementia incidence is not simply caused by a delay in diagnosis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDementiaFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceInsurance, HealthInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID26537590
PMCPMC4634148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.