ReviewStem cells translational medicine2015
Regenerative Medicine Build-Out.
Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autogenic mesenchymal stem cells for intervertebral disc regeneration.International orthopaedics · 2019Pooled it
- Cardiopoietic cell therapy for advanced ischaemic heart failure: results at 39 weeks of the prospective, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled CHART-1 clinical trial.European heart journal · 2017Trial
- Current Perspective on Orthobiology Applications for the Treatment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration (IDD)-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Strategies in Tissue Regenerative Engineering for the Treatment of Human Infertility.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Review
- Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine: A Journey from Adult Stem Cells to Induced Pluripotent Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The clinical quality management system of advanced therapy medicinal products in the hospital setting: A scoping review.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Review
- Hypoxia-induced metabolic reprogramming in mesenchymal stem cells: unlocking the regenerative potential of secreted factors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence powers regenerative medicine into predictive realm.Regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Collagen-Based Scaffolds for Chronic Skin Wound Treatment.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Modern regenerative medicine dictionary: an augmented guide to biotherapy.Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Regenerative potential of multinucleated cells: bone marrow adiponectin-positive multinucleated cells take the lead.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
- Regenerative medicine: current research and perspective in pediatric surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Review
- How to establish infrastructures to achieve more efficient regenerative medicine?Cell and tissue banking · 2023Review
- Application of Injectable, Crosslinked, Fibrin-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Scaffolds for In Vivo Remodeling.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Mass Customized Outlook for Regenerative Heart Failure Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Regenerative medicine clinical readiness.Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Emerging workforce readiness in regenerative healthcare.Regenerative medicine · 2021Article
- RESTORE Survey on the Public Perception of Advanced Therapies and ATMPs in Europe-Why the European Union Should Invest More!Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Stem cell preservation for regenerative therapies: ethical and governance considerations for the health care sector.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2020Review
- The Progression of Regenerative Medicine and its Impact on Therapy Translation.Clinical and translational science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledRegenerative technologies strive to boost innate repair processes and restitute normative impact. Deployment of regenerative principles into practice is poised to usher in a new era in health care, driving radical innovation in patient management to address the needs of an aging population challenged by escalating chronic diseases. There is urgency to design, execute, and validate viable paradigms for translating and implementing the science of regenerative medicine into tangible health benefits that provide value to stakeholders. A regenerative medicine model of care would entail scalable production and standardized application of clinical grade biotherapies supported by comprehensive supply chain capabilities that integrate sourcing and manufacturing with care delivery. Mayo Clinic has rolled out a blueprint for discovery, translation, and application of regenerative medicine therapies for accelerated adoption into the standard of care. To establish regenerative medical and surgical service lines, the Mayo Clinic model incorporates patient access, enabling platforms and delivery. Access is coordinated through a designated portal, the Regenerative Medicine Consult Service, serving to facilitate patient/provider education, procurement of biomaterials, referral to specialty services, and/or regenerative interventions, often in clinical trials. Platforms include the Regenerative Medicine Biotrust and Good Manufacturing Practice facilities for manufacture of clinical grade products for cell-based, acellular, and/or biomaterial applications. Care delivery leverages dedicated interventional suites for provision of regenerative services. Performance is tracked using a scorecard system to inform decision making. The Mayo Clinic roadmap exemplifies an integrated organization in the discovery, development, and delivery of regenerative medicine within a growing community of practice at the core of modern health care. SIGNIFICANCE: Regenerative medicine is at the vanguard of health care poised to offer solutions for many of today's incurable diseases. Accordingly, there is a pressing need to develop, deploy, and demonstrate a viable framework for rollout of a regenerative medicine model of care. Translation of regenerative medicine principles into practice is feasible, yet clinical validity and utility must be established to ensure approval and adoption. Standardized and scaled-up regenerative products and services across medical and surgical specialties must in turn achieve a value-added proposition, advancing intended outcome beyond current management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.