Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537231›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast.

Joshua S Bloom, Iulia Kotenko, Meru J Sadhu, Sebastian Treusch, Frank W Albert, Leonid Kruglyak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Natural variation suggests candidate genes underlying Caenorhabditis elegans susceptibility to diverse toxicants.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  8. Natural variation suggests candidate genes underlyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua S BloomDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Iulia KotenkoDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.
Meru J SadhuDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Sebastian TreuschTwist Bioscience, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Frank W AlbertDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Leonid KruglyakDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

Funding

Toward comprehensive genetic dissection of complex traits in yeastR01GM102308 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEONID KRUGLYAK · 2012 to 2026
$3.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic mapping studies of quantitative traits typically focus on detecting loci that contribute additively to trait variation. Genetic interactions are often proposed as a contributing factor to trait variation, but the relative contribution of interactions to trait variation is a subject of debate. Here we use a very large cross between two yeast strains to accurately estimate the fraction of phenotypic variance due to pairwise QTL-QTL interactions for 20 quantitative traits. We find that this fraction is 9% on average, substantially less than the contribution of additive QTL (43%). Statistically significant QTL-QTL pairs typically have small individual effect sizes, but collectively explain 40% of the pairwise interaction variance. We show that pairwise interaction variance is largely explained by pairs of loci at least one of which has a significant additive effect. These results refine our understanding of the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and help guide future mapping studies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationQuantitative Trait LociChromosome MappingEpistasis, GeneticGenotypePhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID26537231
PMCPMC4635962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.