Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26537179›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

BRANE Cut: biologically-related a priori network enhancement with graph cuts for gene regulatory network inference.

Aurélie Pirayre, Camille Couprie, Frédérique Bidard, Laurent Duval, Jean-Christophe Pesquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurélie PirayreIFP Energies Nouvelles, 1-4 avenue de Bois-Préau, Rueil-Malmaison, 92852, France. aurelie.pirayre@ifpen.fr.
Camille CouprieIFP Energies Nouvelles, 1-4 avenue de Bois-Préau, Rueil-Malmaison, 92852, France. camille.couprie@ifpen.fr.
Frédérique BidardIFP Energies Nouvelles, 1-4 avenue de Bois-Préau, Rueil-Malmaison, 92852, France. frederique.bidard-michelot@ifp.fr.
Laurent DuvalIFP Energies Nouvelles, 1-4 avenue de Bois-Préau, Rueil-Malmaison, 92852, France. laurent.duval@ifpen.fr.
Jean-Christophe PesquetUniversité Paris-Est, Laboratoire d'Informatique Gaspard-Monge, 5 boulevard Descartes - Champs-sur-Marne, Marne-la-Vallée, 77454, France. jean-christophe.pesquet@univ-paris-est.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInferring gene networks from high-throughput data constitutes an important step in the discovery of relevant regulatory relationships in organism cells. Despite the large number of available Gene Regulatory Network inference methods, the problem remains challenging: the underdetermination in the space of possible solutions requires additional constraints that incorporate a priori information on gene interactions.

methodsWeighting all possible pairwise gene relationships by a probability of edge presence, we formulate the regulatory network inference as a discrete variational problem on graphs. We enforce biologically plausible coupling between groups and types of genes by minimizing an edge labeling functional coding for a priori structures. The optimization is carried out with Graph cuts, an approach popular in image processing and computer vision. We compare the inferred regulatory networks to results achieved by the mutual-information-based Context Likelihood of Relatedness (CLR) method and by the state-of-the-art GENIE3, winner of the DREAM4 multifactorial challenge.

resultsOur BRANE Cut approach infers more accurately the five DREAM4 in silico networks (with improvements from 6% to 11%). On a real Escherichia coli compendium, an improvement of 11.8% compared to CLR and 3% compared to GENIE3 is obtained in terms of Area Under Precision-Recall curve. Up to 48 additional verified interactions are obtained over GENIE3 for a given precision. On this dataset involving 4345 genes, our method achieves a performance similar to that of GENIE3, while being more than seven times faster. The BRANE Cut code is available at: http://www-syscom.univ-mlv.fr/~pirayre/Codes-GRN-BRANE-cut.html.

conclusionsBRANE Cut is a weighted graph thresholding method. Using biologically sound penalties and data-driven parameters, it improves three state-of-the art GRN inference methods. It is applicable as a generic network inference post-processing, due to its computational efficiency.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksArea Under CurveComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticEscherichia coliReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26537179
PMCPMC4634801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.