Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26536430›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2015

Pluripotent stem cell applications for regenerative medicine.

Mathew G Angelos, Dan S Kaufman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Extracellular derivatives for bone metabolism.Journal of advanced research · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cell augmentation strategies for cardiac stem cell therapies.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An EfficientContrast media & molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  15. The role of nanomaterials in cell delivery systems.Medical molecular morphology · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. DNA repair mechanisms in embryonic stem cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mathew G AngelosaDepartment of Medicine bStem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Dan S Kaufman

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HEATHER Hammond NELSON · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Stem Cell Therapy for Myocardial RepairR01HL067828 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KAUFMAN, DAN S., ZHANG, JIANYI · 2001 to 2014
$4.7M
Osteogenic Repair from Human Pluripotent Stem CellsR01DE022556 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KAUFMAN, DAN S. · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
Stem Cell Biology Training ProgramT32GM113846 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PERLINGEIRO, RITA C. R. · 2015 to 2019
$712k
Deciphering Mechanisms of Early Human Hematoendothelial Development.F30DK107017 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ANGELOS, MATHEW · 2015 to 2017
$115k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067828NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022556NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK107017NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM113846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this review, we summarize the current status of clinical trials using therapeutic cells produced from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). We also discuss combined cell and gene therapy via correction of defined mutations in human pluripotent stem cells and provide commentary on key obstacles facing widescale clinical adoption of pluripotent stem cell-based therapy. RECENT

findingsInitial data suggest that hESC/hiPSC-derived cell products used for retinal repair and spinal cord injury are safe for human use. Early-stage studies for treatment of cardiac injury and diabetes are also in progress. However, there remain key concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of these cells that need to be addressed in additional well designed clinical trials. Advances using the clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 gene-editing system offer an improved tool for more rapid and on-target gene correction of genetic diseases. Combined gene and cell therapy using human pluripotent stem cells may provide an additional curative approach for disabling or lethal genetic and degenerative diseases wherein there are currently limited therapeutic opportunities. SUMMARY: Human pluripotent stem cells are emerging as a promising tool to produce cells and tissues suitable for regenerative therapy for a variety of genetic and degenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID26536430
PMCPMC4635470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.