Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26536275›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Tomography of a Cryo-immobilized Yeast Cell Using Ptychographic Coherent X-Ray Diffractive Imaging.

K Giewekemeyer, C Hackenberg, A Aquila, R N Wilke, M R Groves, R Jordanova, V S Lamzin, G Borchers, K Saksl, A V Zozulya and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Three-dimensional single-cell imaging with X-ray waveguides in the holographic regime.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

K GiewekemeyerEuropean XFEL GmbH, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: klaus.giewekemeyer@xfel.eu.
C HackenbergEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Hamburg c/o Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, Germany.
A AquilaEuropean XFEL GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
R N WilkeInstitut für Röntgenphysik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
M R GrovesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Hamburg c/o Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, Germany.
R JordanovaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Hamburg c/o Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, Germany.
V S LamzinEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory Hamburg c/o Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, Germany.
G BorchersEuropean XFEL GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
K SakslInstitute of Materials Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovak Republic.
A V ZozulyaDESY Photon Science, Hamburg, Germany.
M SprungDESY Photon Science, Hamburg, Germany.
A P MancusoEuropean XFEL GmbH, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: adrian.mancuso@xfel.eu.
European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser · DEDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DESlovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural investigation of noncrystalline, soft biological matter using x-rays is of rapidly increasing interest. Large-scale x-ray sources, such as synchrotrons and x-ray free electron lasers, are becoming ever brighter and make the study of such weakly scattering materials more feasible. Variants of coherent diffractive imaging (CDI) are particularly attractive, as the absence of an objective lens between sample and detector ensures that no x-ray photons scattered by a sample are lost in a limited-efficiency imaging system. Furthermore, the reconstructed complex image contains quantitative density information, most directly accessible through its phase, which is proportional to the projected electron density of the sample. If applied in three dimensions, CDI can thus recover the sample's electron density distribution. As the extension to three dimensions is accompanied by a considerable dose applied to the sample, cryogenic cooling is necessary to optimize the structural preservation of a unique sample in the beam. This, however, imposes considerable technical challenges on the experimental realization. Here, we show a route toward the solution of these challenges using ptychographic CDI (PCDI), a scanning variant of coherent imaging. We present an experimental demonstration of the combination of three-dimensional structure determination through PCDI with a cryogenically cooled biological sample--a budding yeast cell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)--using hard (7.9 keV) synchrotron x-rays. This proof-of-principle demonstration in particular illustrates the potential of PCDI for highly sensitive, quantitative three-dimensional density determination of cryogenically cooled, hydrated, and unstained biological matter and paves the way to future studies of unique, nonreproducible biological cells at higher resolution.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationElectronsFreezingImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, TheoreticalPhotonsRadiation DosageSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTomographyX-Ray DiffractionX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID26536275
PMCPMC4643197
OpenAlexW2114146483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.