Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26536258›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

A Chemomechanical Model of Matrix and Nuclear Rigidity Regulation of Focal Adhesion Size.

Xuan Cao, Yuan Lin, Tristian P Driscoll, Janusz Franco-Barraza, Edna Cukierman, Robert L Mauck, Vivek B Shenoy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuan CaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yuan LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tristian P DriscollDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Janusz Franco-BarrazaCancer Biology Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Edna CukiermanCancer Biology Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert L MauckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Vivek B ShenoyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: vshenoy@seas.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
PSOC@Penn Education and OutreachU54CA193417 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2015 to 2020
$10.5M
Pathological consequences of altered tissue mechanics in fibrosisR01EB017753 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JANMEY, PAUL A, SHENOY, VIVEK · 2014 to 2025
$6.3M
Research Supplement - Quantitative analyses of tumor cell extravasationU01CA202177 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KAMM, ROGER D · 2015 to 2020
$4.2M
Multi-scale biomechanics of engineered and native fibrous load-bearing tissueR01EB002425 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLIOTT, DAWN M, MAUCK, ROBERT L · 2003 to 2017
$4.1M
3D-Adhesion Stromagenesis in Cancer PermissivenessR01CA113451 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CUKIERMAN, EDNA · 2006 to 2016
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30-CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113451NCI NIH HHS R01CA113451NCI NIH HHS U01 CA202177NCI NIH HHS U01CA202177NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193417NCI NIH HHS U54CA193417NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002425NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB002425NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017753NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB017753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, a chemomechanical model describing the growth dynamics of cell-matrix adhesion structures (i.e., focal adhesions (FAs)) is developed. We show that there are three regimes for FA evolution depending on their size. Specifically, nascent adhesions with initial lengths below a critical value that are yet to engage in actin fibers will dissolve, whereas bigger ones will grow into mature FAs with a steady state size. In adhesions where growth surpasses the steady state size, disassembly will occur until their sizes are reduced to the equilibrium state. This finding arises from the fact that polymerization of adhesion proteins is force-dependent. Under actomyosin contraction, individual integrin bonds within small FAs (i.e., nascent adhesions or focal complexes) must transmit higher loads while the phenomenon of stress concentration occurs at the edge of large adhesion patches. As such, an effective stiffness of the FA-extracellular matrix complex that is either too small or too large will be relatively low, resulting in a limited actomyosin pulling force developed at the edge that is insufficient to prevent disassembly. Furthermore, it is found that a stiffer extracellular matrix and/or nucleus, as well as a stronger chemomechanical feedback, will induce larger adhesions along with a higher level of contraction force. Interestingly, switching the extracellular side from an elastic half-space, corresponding to some widely used in vitro gel substrates, to a one-dimensional fiber (as in the case of cells anchoring to a fibrous scaffold in vivo) does not qualitative change these conclusions. Our model predictions are in good agreement with a variety of experimental observations obtained in this study as well as those reported in the literature. Furthermore, this new model, to our knowledge, provides a framework with which to understand how both intracellular and extracellular perturbations lead to changes in adhesion structure number and size.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, ChemicalActomyosinBiomechanical PhenomenaCell NucleusElasticityExtracellular MatrixFocal AdhesionsIntegrinsPolymerizationActomyosinIntegrins

Identifiers

PMID26536258
PMCPMC4643201
OpenAlexW1944101385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.