ArticleBiophysical journal2015
A Chemomechanical Model of Matrix and Nuclear Rigidity Regulation of Focal Adhesion Size.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Review
- Active viscoelastic models for cell and tissue mechanics.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Ectromelia Virus Affects the Formation and Spatial Organization of Adhesive Structures in Murine Dendritic Cells In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cooperative melting in double-stranded peptide chains through local mechanical interactions.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Mechanics of tensegrity cell units incorporating asymmetry and insights intoJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- On modeling the multiscale mechanobiology of soft tissues: Challenges and progress.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Actomyosin contractility and buckling of microtubules in nucleation, growth and disassembling of focal adhesions.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2022Article
- Multiscale mechanobiology: Coupling models of adhesion kinetics and nonlinear tissue mechanics.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- From the Matrix to the Nucleus and Back: Mechanobiology in the Light of Health, Pathologies, and Regeneration of Oral Periodontal Tissues.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Nuclear envelope wrinkling predicts mesenchymal progenitor cell mechano-response in 2D and 3D microenvironments.Biomaterials · 2021Article
- Viscoelasticity Acts as a Marker for Tumor Extracellular Matrix Characteristics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Fundamental Characteristics of Neuron Adhesion Revealed by Forced Peeling and Time-Dependent Healing.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Engineering clinically-relevant human fibroblastic cell-derived extracellular matrices.Methods in cell biology · 2020Article
- Mechanosensitivity Occurs along the Adhesome's Force Train and Affects Traction Stress.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Dynamics of Mechanosensitive Nascent Adhesion Formation.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019Review
- Remodeling of the Collagen Matrix in Aging Skin Promotes Melanoma Metastasis and Affects Immune Cell Motility.Cancer discovery · 2019Article
- Effect of Loading History on Airway Smooth Muscle Cell-Matrix Adhesions.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- ECM Cross-Linking Regulates Invadopodia Dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, a chemomechanical model describing the growth dynamics of cell-matrix adhesion structures (i.e., focal adhesions (FAs)) is developed. We show that there are three regimes for FA evolution depending on their size. Specifically, nascent adhesions with initial lengths below a critical value that are yet to engage in actin fibers will dissolve, whereas bigger ones will grow into mature FAs with a steady state size. In adhesions where growth surpasses the steady state size, disassembly will occur until their sizes are reduced to the equilibrium state. This finding arises from the fact that polymerization of adhesion proteins is force-dependent. Under actomyosin contraction, individual integrin bonds within small FAs (i.e., nascent adhesions or focal complexes) must transmit higher loads while the phenomenon of stress concentration occurs at the edge of large adhesion patches. As such, an effective stiffness of the FA-extracellular matrix complex that is either too small or too large will be relatively low, resulting in a limited actomyosin pulling force developed at the edge that is insufficient to prevent disassembly. Furthermore, it is found that a stiffer extracellular matrix and/or nucleus, as well as a stronger chemomechanical feedback, will induce larger adhesions along with a higher level of contraction force. Interestingly, switching the extracellular side from an elastic half-space, corresponding to some widely used in vitro gel substrates, to a one-dimensional fiber (as in the case of cells anchoring to a fibrous scaffold in vivo) does not qualitative change these conclusions. Our model predictions are in good agreement with a variety of experimental observations obtained in this study as well as those reported in the literature. Furthermore, this new model, to our knowledge, provides a framework with which to understand how both intracellular and extracellular perturbations lead to changes in adhesion structure number and size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.