Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26535755›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Rationale and prospects for novel pneumococcal vaccines.

Kristin Moffitt, Richard Malley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Safety ofViruses · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Diverse Mechanisms of Protective Anti-Pneumococcal Antibodies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Epidemiology of non-vaccine serotypes ofHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  17. A chitosan-based nanosystem as pneumococcal vaccine delivery platform.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Chemically SynthesizedMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  20. Sugar-Coated Killer: Serotype 3 Pneumococcal Disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin Moffitta Division of Infectious Diseases ; Department of Medicine; Boston Children's Hospital ; Boston , MA USA.
Richard Malleya Division of Infectious Diseases ; Department of Medicine; Boston Children's Hospital ; Boston , MA USA.
Boston Children's Museum · USOffice of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Innate and acquired immune responses to novel pneumococcal T cell antigensK08AI095352 · NIAID · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MOFFITT, KRISTIN LEIGH · 2011 to 2015
$668k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI095352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae remains one of the most frequent bacterial causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. National immunization programs implementing pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have successfully reduced rates of vaccine-type invasive disease and colonization both via direct effects in immunized children and, in some settings, indirect effects in unimmunized individuals. Limitations of the current PCV approach include the emergence of non-vaccine serotypes contributing to carriage and invasive disease in high-PCV coverage settings and the high cost of goods of PCVs which limits their accessibility in developing countries where the burden of disease remains highest. Furthermore, the distribution of serotypes causing disease varies geographically and includes more serotypes than are currently covered in a single PCV formulation. Researchers have long been exploring the potential of genetically conserved non-capsular pneumococcal antigens as vaccine candidates that might overcome such limitations. To better evaluate the rationale of such approaches, an understanding of the mechanisms of immunity to the various phases of pneumococcal infection is of paramount importance. Herein we will review the evolving understanding of both vaccine-induced and naturally acquired immunity to pneumococcal colonization and infection and discuss how this informs current approaches using serotype-independent pneumococcal vaccine candidates. We will then review the alternative vaccine candidates that have been or are currently under evaluation in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialHumansImmunity, InnateImmunization ProgramsPneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesSerogroupStreptococcus pneumoniaeVaccinationVaccines, ConjugateAntigens, BacterialPneumococcal VaccinesVaccines, Conjugateantibodypneumococcal colonizationpneumococcusserotype-independent vaccinesStreptococcus pneumoniaeTH17 cells

Identifiers

PMID26535755
PMCPMC5049723
OpenAlexW2187762045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.