ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2014
Systematic Review of Biological Modulation of Healing in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory factors released by ACL reconstruction tendon grafts and their potential for macrophage polarization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A machine learning and nomogram-based study: effect of applying biologically formulated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the degree of pain relief after rotator cuff repair and prediction modeling, integrating biomedicine and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Molecular Biology of ACL Graft Healing: Early Mechanical Loading Perspective.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Strategies for promoting tendon-bone healing: Current status and prospects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Clinical translation and challenges of biodegradable magnesium-based interference screws in ACL reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Biological modulations to facilitate graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), when and where to apply? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021Review
- Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2021Review
- Evaluation of animal models and methods for assessing shoulder function after rotator cuff tear: A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021Review
- The effect of thermosensitive hydrogel platelet-rich-plasma complex in the treatment of partial tear of anterior cruciate ligament in rat model.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2020Article
- Quantitative MRI UTE-T2* and T2* Show Progressive and Continued Graft Maturation Over 2 Years in Human Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2019Article
- Micro-scale assessment of the postoperative effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction preclinical study using a 7.1T micro-magnetic resonance imaging.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- The non-reconstructive treatment of complete ACL tear with biological enhancement in clinical and preclinical studies: A systematic review.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2018Review
- Macrophage M1 Plays a Positive Role in Aseptic Inflammation-Related Graft Loosening After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.Inflammation · 2017Article
- Demineralized Bone Matrix to Augment Tendon-Bone Healing: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2017Article
- Biodegradable Magnesium Screws Accelerate Fibrous Tissue Mineralization at the Tendon-Bone Insertion in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Model of Rabbit.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- BIOLOGICAL ENHANCEMENTS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.Acta ortopedica brasileiraReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether biological modulation is effective to promote healing in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains unclear. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of both clinical and experimental evidence of preclinical animal studies on biological modulation to promote healing in ACL reconstruction. STUDY
designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 2.
methodsA systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus search engines. Inclusion criteria were clinical and animal studies involving subjects with ACL injury with the use of biological modulation to promote healing outcomes. Methodological quality of clinical studies was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) appraisal tool, and animal studies were evaluated by a scoring system based on a published checklist of good animal studies.
resultsTen clinical studies and 50 animal studies were included. Twenty-five included studies were regarded as good quality, with a methodological score ≥5. These studies suggested that transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), mesenchymal stem cells, osteogenic factors, and modalities that reduce local inflammation may be beneficial to promote graft healing in ACL reconstruction.
conclusionThis systematic review suggests that biological modulation is able to promote healing on top of surgical treatment for ACL injuries. This treatment strategy chiefly works through promotion of healing at the tunnel-graft interface, but the integrity of the intra-articular midsubstance of the graft would be another target for biological modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.