ReviewJournal of exercise rehabilitation2015
Role of creatine supplementation in exercise-induced muscle damage: A mini review.
Review in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effects of Four Weeks of In-Season Pre-Workout Supplementation on Performance, Body Composition, Muscle Damage, and Health-Related Markers in Basketball Players: A Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Metabolomic Responses in On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2024Article
- The roles of growth factors and hormones in the regulation of muscle satellite cells for cultured meat production.Journal of animal science and technology · 2023Review
- Functional Properties of Meat in Athletes' Performance and Recovery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Fish Allergenicity Modulation Using Tailored Enriched Diets-Where Are We?Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Sarcopenia: Etiology, Nutritional Approaches, and miRNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Creatine for Exercise and Sports Performance, with Recovery Considerations for Healthy Populations.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Review
- The Evolving Applications of Creatine Supplementation: Could Creatine Improve Vascular Health?Nutrients · 2020Review
- Dietary Creatine Supplementation in Gilthead Seabream (Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Article
- Creatine Prevents the Structural and Functional Damage to Mitochondria in Myogenic, Oxidatively Stressed C2C12 Cells and Restores Their Differentiation Capacity.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2016Article
- Insights into the molecular etiology of exercise-induced inflammation: opportunities for optimizing performance.Journal of inflammation research · 2016Review
- Creatine Use in Sports.Sports healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle damage is induced by both high-intensity resistance and endurance exercise. Creatine is a widely used dietary supplement to improve exercise performance by reducing exercise-induced muscle damage. Many researchers have suggested that taking creatine reduces muscle damage by decreasing the inflammatory response and oxidative stress, regulating calcium homeostasis, and activating satellite cells. However, the underlying mechanisms of creatine and muscle damage have not been clarified. Therefore, this review discusses the regulatory effects of creatine on muscle damage by compiling the information collected from basic science and sports science research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.