Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26535147›Full record

ArticleRMD open2015

Self-reported quality care for knee osteoarthritis: comparisons across Denmark, Norway, Portugal and the UK.

N Østerås, K P Jordan, B Clausen, C Cordeiro, K Dziedzic, J Edwards, G Grønhaug, A Higginbottom, H Lund, G Pacheco and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

N ØsteråsNational Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology , Diakonhjemmet Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
K P JordanArthritis Research UK, Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University , Staffordshire , UK.
B ClausenResearch Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy , Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark.
C CordeiroFaculty of Science and Technology and Centre for Research and Development in Health (CESUAlg) , University of Algarve , Faro , Portugal ; Centre of Statistics and Applications (CEAUL), University of Lisbon , Lisbon , Portugal.
K DziedzicArthritis Research UK, Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University , Staffordshire , UK.
J EdwardsArthritis Research UK, Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University , Staffordshire , UK.
G GrønhaugNational Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology , Diakonhjemmet Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
A HigginbottomArthritis Research UK, Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University , Staffordshire , UK.
H LundResearch Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy , Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark.
G PachecoSchool of Health (ESSUAlg), University of Algarve , Faro , Portugal.
S PaisSchool of Health (ESSUAlg), University of Algarve , Faro , Portugal ; Centre for Research and Development in Health (CESUAlg), University of Algarve , Faro , Portugal.
K B HagenNational Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology , Diakonhjemmet Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
Keele University · GBDiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOUniversity of Algarve · PTUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Department of Health CAT CDRF 10-018Department of Health IAT/I-PF/010/009Department of Health KMRF-2014-03-002Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10386Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess and compare patient perceived quality of osteoarthritis (OA) management in primary healthcare in Denmark, Norway, Portugal and the UK.

methodsParticipants consulting with clinical signs and symptoms of knee OA were identified in 30 general practices and invited to complete a cross-sectional survey including quality indicators (QI) for OA care. A QI was considered as eligible if the participant had checked 'Yes' or 'No', and as achieved if the participant had checked 'Yes' to the indicator. The median percentage (with IQR and range) of eligible QIs achieved by country was determined and compared in negative binominal regression analysis. Achievement of individual QIs by country was determined and compared using logistic regression analyses.

resultsA total of 354 participants self-reported QI achievement. The median percentage of eligible QIs achieved (checked 'Yes') was 48% (IQR 28%, 64%; range 0-100%) for the total sample with relatively similar medians across three of four countries. Achievement rates on individual QIs showed a large variation ranging from 11% (referral to services for losing weight) to 67% (information about the importance of exercise) with significant differences in achievement rates between the countries.

conclusionsThe results indicated a potential for improvement in OA care in all four countries, but for somewhat different aspects of OA care. By exploring these differences and comparing healthcare services, ideas may be generated on how the quality might be improved across nations. Larger studies are needed to confirm and further explore the findings.

Indexed as

Health services researchOsteoarthritisPatient perspectiveQuality Indicators

Identifiers

PMID26535147
PMCPMC4623369
OpenAlexW2271113279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.