ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2015
The staining effect of different mouthwashes containing nanoparticles on dental enamel.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative in vitro evaluation of staining of natural tooth enamel by chitosan, chlorhexidine, and chitosan-chlorhexidine mouthwashes.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effects of Various Types of Mouthwash on Enamel and Cementum of Permanent Teeth: An In Vitro Study.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
- Photoinactivation Effects of Curcumin, Nano-curcumin, and Erythrosine on Planktonic and Biofilm Cultures ofJournal of lasers in medical sciences · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against Lactobacillus casei using curcumin, nano-curcumin, or erythrosine and a dental LED curing device.Lasers in medical science · 2023Article
- Does the application of whitening dentifrices during at-home bleaching affect the bond strength of resin composite to dentin?BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Translucency and Color Stability of a Simplified Shade Nanohybrid Composite after Ultrasonic Scaling and Air-Powder Polishing.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effect of an orthodontic resin modified with silver-nanoparticles on enamel color change.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2022Article
- Harnessing the Antibacterial Properties of Fluoridated Chitosan Polymers against Oral Biofilms.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Transcriptomic Profile Analysis ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Biocompatibility of several colloidal solutions containing nanoparticles on human gingival fibroblasts.Dental research journal · 2021Article
- Nanoparticles as Anti-Microbial, Anti-Inflammatory, and Remineralizing Agents in Oral Care Cosmetics: A Review of the Current Situation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Spectrophotometric Analysis of Dental Enamel Staining to Antiseptic and Dietary Agents: In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate combined with hydrogen peroxide and CPP-ACPF in whitening and microhardness of enamel.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2017Article
- Effectiveness of MI Paste Plus and Remin Pro on remineralization and color improvement of postorthodontic white spot lesions.Dental research journalArticle
- The staining potential of the dental enamel with cerium oxide nanoparticle mouthwash andJournal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
- Comparison of antibacterial efficacy of coconut oil and chlorhexidine onJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of several mouthwashes containing nanoparticles on discoloration of dental enamel, and compare the results with that of 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX). MATERIAL AND
methodsSixty intact premolars were randomly assigned to six groups. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the color of the teeth (T1) according to the CIELAB system. The specimens in groups 1 to 4 were then immersed in colloidal solutions containing nanoTiO2 (Group 1), nanoZnO (Group 2), nanoAg (Group 3) and nanoCuO (Group 4). In groups 5 and 6, a 0.2% CHX mouthwash and distilled water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. After 24 hours of immersion, color determination was repeated (T2). The third color assessment was accomplished after brushing (T3). The L, a, and b values were recorded and the color change (?E) between different stages was calculated.
resultsANOVA revealed significant between-group differences in the color change between T1 and T2 stages, as well as between T1 and T3 time points (p<0.05), whereas the color change between T2 and T3 was not significantly different among the study groups (p=0.09). ?ET1-T3 was significantly lower in the specimens immersed in distilled water or CHX as compared to the nanoparticle-containing mouthwashes (p<0.05). The highest ?E value pertained to the specimens immersed in nanoZnO-containing solution. The TiO2 nanoparticles caused the lowest staining among the tested nanoparticles.
conclusionsThe mouthwashes containing nanoparticles produced comparable or even greater enamel discoloration compared to CHX. Brushing had little effect on removal of induced stains. KEY WORDS: Nanoparticle, mouthrinse, mouthwash, staining, enamel, discoloration, chlorhexidine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.