Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26535044›Full record

ReviewViszeralmedizin2014

Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Antimicrobial Therapy of Intra-Abdominal Infections.

Stefan Hagel, Hubert Scheuerlein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viszeralmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. [Enterococci and surgical site infections : Causal agent or harmless commensals?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan HagelCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, ; Department of Internal Medicine IV, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, ; Center for Sepsis Control & Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Hubert ScheuerleinDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase of antimicrobial resistances to first- and second-line antibiotics, especially of Gram-negative bacteria, and the lack of novel antimicrobial substances are a challenge in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

methodsReview article.

resultsThe efficacy and safety of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in visceral surgery has been demonstrated by several meta-analyses. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is defined as a single administration of antibiotics shortly before a surgical intervention. A so-called prolonged prophylaxis including the postoperative period (e.g. 1-3 days postoperatively) should be avoided as it does not reduce the number of wound infections and is associated with an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance and side effects. Antimicrobial management of severe intra-abdominal infections involves a delicate balance of optimizing empirical therapy which has been shown to improve outcomes while simultaneously reducing unnecessary use of antimicrobials.

conclusionAntimicrobial resistance poses a serious threat to human health and requires a rational use of antibiotics to curb further spreading. This applies for perioperative prophylaxis as well as for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceIntra-abdominal infectionsPerioperative antibiotic prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID26535044
PMCPMC4571728
OpenAlexW2004501654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.