ArticleP & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management2015
Evaluation of Biosimilars for Formulary Inclusion: Factors for Consideration by P&T Committees.
Article in P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Institutional Guide for Formulary Decisions of Biosimilars.Hospital pharmacy · 2023Review
- Practical Strategies for Advanced Practitioners Streamlining the Integration of Oncology Biosimilar Therapies Into Practice.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2022Review
- Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Article
- Does Biosimilar Bevacizumab Offer Affordable Treatment Options for Cancer Patients in the USA? A Budget Impact Analysis from US Commercial and Medicare Payer Perspectives.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021Article
- Effect on Patients' Outcomes of a Change to Biosimilar Filgrastim Product in Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2021Article
- Considerations for the US health-system pharmacist in a world of biosimilars.Drugs in context · 2020Article
- Review
- Biosimilars: Considerations for Payers.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2019Article
- Review
- Biosimilar Drugs and the Hospital Formulary: A Canadian Experience.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
P&T committees will play a key role in driving the adoption of biosimilars, which have unique characteristics compared with small-molecule generic drugs. Key elements of formulary review will include clinical parameters, product characteristics, and institutional considerations, which are among the issues covered in this article.
Identifiers
26535024PMC4606858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.