Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26534946›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2015

Epidemiology of Mycoplasma genitalium in British men and women aged 16–44 years: evidence from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

Pam Sonnenberg, Catherine A Ison, Soazig Clifton, Nigel Field, Clare Tanton, Kate Soldan, Simon Beddows, Sarah Alexander, Rumena Khanom, Pamela Saunders and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sexually transmitted infections · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Prevalence ofSexually transmitted infections · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Trends and Themes inOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Association Between Mycoplasma genitalium and Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Mycoplasma Genitalium - Where are we at?Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  14. Detection of human IgG antibodies againstJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. JMM Profile:Journal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  17. Risk factors associated with IgG seropersistence toEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Article
  18. Prevalence of Site-SpecificInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  19. Implementation ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pam SonnenbergResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK. p.sonnenberg@ucl.ac.uk
Catherine A Ison
Soazig Clifton
Nigel Field
Clare Tanton
Kate Soldan
Simon Beddows
Sarah Alexander
Rumena Khanom
Pamela Saunders
Andrew J Copas
Kaye Wellings
Catherine H Mercer
Anne M Johnson

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701757Wellcome Trust 084840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are currently no large general population epidemiological studies of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), which include prevalence, risk factors, symptoms and co-infection in men and women across a broad age range.

methodsIn 2010-–12, we conducted the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3), a probability sample survey in Britain. Urine from 4507 sexually-experienced participants, aged 16–44 years, was tested for MG.

resultsMG prevalence was 1.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7–1.8%] in men and 1.3% (0.9–1.9%) in women. There were no positive MG tests in men aged 16–19, and prevalence peaked at 2.1% (1.2–3.7%) in men aged 25–34 years. In women, prevalence was highest in 16–19 year olds, at 2.4% (1.2–4.8%), and decreased with age. Men of Black ethnicity were more likely to test positive for MG [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 12.1; 95% CI: 3.7–39.4). For both men and women, MG was strongly associated with reporting sexual risk behaviours (increasing number of total and new partners, and unsafe sex, in the past year). Women with MG were more likely to report post-coital bleeding (AOR 5.8; 95%CI 1.4–23.3). However, the majority of men (94.4%), and over half of women (56.2%) with MG did not report any sexually transmitted infection (STI) symptoms. Men with MG were more likely to report previously diagnosed gonorrhoea, syphilis or non-specific urethritis, and women previous trichomoniasis.

conclusionsThis study strengthens evidence that MG is an STI. MG was identified in over 1% of the population, including in men with high-risk behaviours in older age groups that are often not included in STI prevention measures.

Indexed as

Mycoplasma genitaliumAdolescentAdultAge DistributionBlack PeopleFemaleGonorrheaHumansMaleMycoplasma InfectionsOdds RatioPrevalenceRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID26534946
PMCPMC4690003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.