Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26534789›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Circulating miR-106a is a Novel Prognostic and Lymph Node Metastasis Indicator for Cholangiocarcinoma.

Qingbao Cheng, Feiling Feng, Lumin Zhu, Yanhua Zheng, Xiangji Luo, Chen Liu, Bin Yi, Xiaoqing Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Circulating microRNAs Expression as Prognosis Biomarker of Cholangiocarcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026
    Article
  3. Cholangiocarcinoma: The era of liquid biopsy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  4. Overview of miR-106a Regulatory Roles: from Cancer to Aging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Role of microRNAs in Cholangiocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qingbao ChengDepartment of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.
Feiling FengDepartment of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.
Lumin ZhuDepartment of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.
Yanhua ZhengDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.
Xiangji LuoDepartment of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.
Chen LiuDepartment of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.
Bin YiDepartment of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqing JiangDepartment of Biliary Surgery I, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Rd, Yangpu, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a common biliary malignancy. Despite continuing advances, novel indicators are urgently needed to identify patients with a poor prognosis. Several microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to be dysregulated in CCA tissues. The purpose of the current study was to explore the potential use of certain miRNAs as serum indicators. A total of 157 individuals, including103 CCA patients, were recruited into this study. We first used qRT-PCR to evaluate 5 CCA-related miRNAs in the serum of 95 individuals to identify significantly deregulated miRNAs. A logistic regression was used to analyse the potential variables influencing lymph node metastasis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to determine the association between possible prognostic variables and overall survival (OS). We observed that decreased serum miR-106a confers a higher likelihood of lymph node metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) 18.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-56.4, p < 0.01]. Additionally, lower circulating miR-106a levels (HR 5.1; 95% CI 2.2-11.8; p < 0.01) and non-radical surgery (HR 4.2; 95% CI 2.3-7.7; p < 0.01) were independent predictors for poor prognosis. Together, reduced expression of serum miR-106a is a powerful prognostic indicator for CCA patients. The dismal outcome of these CCA patients might correlate with a higher risk of lymph node metastasis.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCholangiocarcinomaDown-RegulationFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26534789
PMCPMC4632041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.