Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26534775›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2016

Creating Youth-Supportive Communities: Outcomes from the Connect-to-Protect® (C2P) Structural Change Approach to Youth HIV Prevention.

Robin Lin Miller, Patrick F Janulis, Sarah J Reed, Gary W Harper, Jonathan Ellen, Cherrie B Boyer, Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. The Ongoing Process of HIV-Stigma (Re)Production.Sociological perspectives : SP : official publication of the Pacific Sociological Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robin Lin MillerMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Mill1493@msu.edu.
Patrick F JanulisMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Patrick.janulis@northwestern.edu.
Sarah J ReedMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Reedsar3@gmail.com.
Gary W HarperUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. gwharper@umich.edu.
Jonathan EllenJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. jellen@jhmi.edu.
Cherrie B BoyerUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Cherrie.boyer@ucsf.edu.
Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions
Michigan State University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Adol. Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS InterventionsU01HD040474 · NICHD · WESTAT, INC. · PI HARRIS, DONALD ROBERT · 2001 to 2016
$114.4M
LEADERSHIP GROUP FOR ADOLESCENT MEDICINE TRIALS NETWORKU01HD040533 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WILSON, CRAIG M · 2001 to 2016
$76.4M
NRSA POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN HIV PREVENTION REST32MH019985 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI GALLETLY, CAROL L · 1996 to 2017
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS 5 U01 HD040533NICHD NIH HHS 5 U01 HD 40474NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040474NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040533NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing HIV incidence among adolescents represents an urgent global priority. Structural change approaches to HIV prevention may reduce youth risk by addressing the economic, social, cultural, and political factors that elevate it. We assessed whether achievement of structural changes made by eight Connect-to-Protect (C2P) coalitions were associated with improvements in youth's views of their community over the first 4 years of coalitions' mobilization. We recruited annual cross-sectional samples of targeted youth from each C2P community. We sampled youth in neighborhood venues. We interviewed a total of 2461 youth over 4 years. Males (66 %) and youth of color comprised the majority (52 % Hispanic/Latinos; 41 % African Americans) of those interviewed. By year 4, youth reported greater satisfaction with their community as a youth-supportive setting. They reported their needs were better met by available community resources compared with year 1. However, these findings were moderated by risk population such that those from communities where C2P focused on young men who have sex with men (YMSM) reported no changes over time whereas those from communities focused on other at-risk youth reported significant improvements over time in satisfaction and resource needs being met. Internalized HIV stigma increased over time among those from communities serving other at-risk youth and was unchanged among those from YMSM communities. The very different results we observe over time between communities focused on YMSM versus other at-risk youth may suggest it is unreasonable to assume identical chains of structural causality across youth populations who have such different historical relationships to HIV and who encounter very different kinds of entrenched discrimination within their communities.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorAdolescentBlack or African AmericanCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity NetworksCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSocial StigmaYoung AdultCoalitionsHigh-risk youthHIV preventionStructural changeYoung MSM

Identifiers

PMID26534775
PMCPMC4714586
OpenAlexW2422866653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.