Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26534772›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2016

Modeling the biomechanics of fetal movements.

Stefaan W Verbruggen, Jessica H W Loo, Tayyib T A Hayat, Joseph V Hajnal, Mary A Rutherford, Andrew T M Phillips, Niamh C Nowlan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computation of Fetal Kicking in Various Fetal Health Examinations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Volume-Adjustable Artificial Womb for Extremely Preterm Infants.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Endostructural and periosteal growth of the human humerus.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefaan W VerbruggenDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2321-1367
Jessica H W LooDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Tayyib T A HayatDivision of Imaging Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, UK.
Joseph V HajnalDivision of Imaging Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering & Centre for the Developing Brain, Kings College London, London, UK.
Mary A RutherfordDivision of Imaging Sciences, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health & Centre for the Developing Brain, Kings College London, London, UK.
Andrew T M PhillipsStructural Biomechanics, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Niamh C NowlanDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. n.nowlan@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120088465Medical Research Council MR/K006355/1Versus Arthritis 20683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal movements in the uterus are a natural part of development and are known to play an important role in normal musculoskeletal development. However, very little is known about the biomechanical stimuli that arise during movements in utero, despite these stimuli being crucial to normal bone and joint formation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to create a series of computational steps by which the forces generated during a kick in utero could be predicted from clinically observed fetal movements using novel cine-MRI data of three fetuses, aged 20-22 weeks. A custom tracking software was designed to characterize the movements of joints in utero, and average uterus deflection of [Formula: see text] mm due to kicking was calculated. These observed displacements provided boundary conditions for a finite element model of the uterine environment, predicting an average reaction force of [Formula: see text] N generated by a kick against the uterine wall. Finally, these data were applied as inputs for a musculoskeletal model of a fetal kick, resulting in predicted maximum forces in the muscles surrounding the hip joint of approximately 8 N, while higher maximum forces of approximately 21 N were predicted for the muscles surrounding the knee joint. This study provides a novel insight into the closed mechanical environment of the uterus, with an innovative method allowing elucidation of the biomechanical interaction of the developing fetus with its surroundings.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaFetal MovementFinite Element AnalysisHip JointHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineCine MRIComputational modelDevelopmental dysplasia of the hipJoint biomechanicsMusculoskeletal development

Identifiers

PMID26534772
PMCPMC4945693
OpenAlexW1910793025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.