Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26531831›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2016

WT1 Expression in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Assessing its Presence, Magnitude and Temporal Changes as Prognostic Factors.

Zsófia Ujj, Gergely Buglyó, Miklós Udvardy, Dániel Beyer, György Vargha, Sándor Biró, László Rejtő

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. MRD-directed and risk-adapted individualized stratified treatment of AML.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zsófia UjjInstitute of Internal Medicine, Division of Haematology, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei körút, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.
Gergely BuglyóDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei körút, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary. gbuglyo@hotmail.com.
Miklós UdvardyInstitute of Internal Medicine, Division of Haematology, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei körút, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.
Dániel BeyerDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei körút, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.
György VarghaDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei körút, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.
Sándor BiróDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei körút, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.
László RejtőInstitute of Internal Medicine, Division of Haematology, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei körút, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression of the gene Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) has been suggested as a marker of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but literature data are not without controversy. Our aim was to assess the presence, magnitude and temporal changes of WT1 expression as prognostic factors. 60 AML patients were followed until death or the end of the 6-year observation period. Blood samples were taken at diagnosis, post-induction, during remission and in case of a relapse. Using quantitative real-time PCR, we determined WT1 expression from each sample, normalized it against the endogenous control gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and classified samples as negative, moderately positive or highly positive. We divided the patients into groups based on detected WT1 expression values, illustrated overall and disease-free survival on Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared differences between each group by the logrank test. Disappearance of WT1-positivity during chemotherapy had a favorable effect on survival. Interestingly, no difference was seen between the survivals of WT1-positive subgroups that expressed moderate or high levels of WT1 mRNA. A 1-log decrease in WT1 expression without becoming negative did not affect prognosis, either. Our results suggest that defining a cut-off value for WT1-positivity, rather than just using logarithmic figures of changes in gene expression, might have prognostic use in post-induction AML patients. We encourage further, larger-scale studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFlow CytometryFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorRNA, MessengerWT1 ProteinsAcute myeloid leukemiaOverexpressionQuantitative real-time PCRWT1 gene

Identifiers

PMID26531831
OpenAlexW2223646220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.