ArticleScientific reports2015
Systems biology-guided identification of synthetic lethal gene pairs and its potential use to discover antibiotic combinations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genome-scale metabolic modeling reveals increased reliance on valine catabolism in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Pooled it
- Computational methods, databases and tools for synthetic lethality prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Drug repurposing for next-generation combination therapies against multidrug-resistant bacteria.Theranostics · 2021Review
- Antibiotic resistance: Time of synthesis in a post-genomic age.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Synthetic Lethality through the Lens of Medicinal Chemistry.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020Review
- Extreme Antagonism Arising from Gene-Environment Interactions.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Article
- Flux balance analysis with or without molecular crowding fails to predict two thirds of experimentally observed epistasis in yeast.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Drug combinations: a strategy to extend the life of antibiotics in the 21st century.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2019Review
- Genome-scale metabolic modeling of responses to polymyxins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Antibiotic efficacy-context matters.Current opinion in microbiology · 2017Review
- Article
- Big Data: Challenges and opportunities for clinical pharmacology.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical models of metabolism from bacterial systems biology have proven their utility across multiple fields, for example metabolic engineering, growth phenotype simulation, and biological discovery. The usefulness of the models stems from their ability to compute a link between genotype and phenotype, but their ability to accurately simulate gene-gene interactions has not been investigated extensively. Here we assess how accurately a metabolic model for Escherichia coli computes one particular type of gene-gene interaction, synthetic lethality, and find that the accuracy rate is between 25% and 43%. The most common failure modes were incorrect computation of single gene essentiality and biological information that was missing from the model. Moreover, we performed virtual and biological screening against several synthetic lethal pairs to explore whether two-compound formulations could be found that inhibit the growth of Gram-negative bacteria. One set of molecules was identified that, depending on the concentrations, inhibits E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium in an additive or antagonistic manner. These findings pinpoint specific ways in which to improve the predictive ability of metabolic models, and highlight one potential application of systems biology to drug discovery and translational medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.