Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26531770›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Human cooperation in groups: variation begets variation.

Pieter van den Berg, Lucas Molleman, Jaakko Junikka, Mikael Puurtinen, Franz J Weissing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pieter van den BergTheoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences (TRÊS), University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands.
Lucas MollemanTheoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences (TRÊS), University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands.
Jaakko JunikkaUniversity of Jyvaskyla, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O.Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Mikael PuurtinenUniversity of Jyvaskyla, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O.Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Franz J WeissingTheoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences (TRÊS), University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 295707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many experiments on human cooperation have revealed that individuals differ systematically in their tendency to cooperate with others. It has also been shown that individuals condition their behaviour on the overall cooperation level of their peers. Yet, little is known about how individuals respond to heterogeneity in cooperativeness in their neighbourhood. Here, we present an experimental study investigating whether and how people respond to heterogeneous behaviour in a public goods game. We find that a large majority of subjects does respond to heterogeneity in their group, but they respond in quite different ways. Most subjects contribute less to the public good when the contributions of their peers are more heterogeneous, but a substantial fraction of individuals consistently contributes more in this case. In addition, we find that individuals that respond positively to heterogeneity have a higher general cooperation tendency. The finding that social responsiveness occurs in different forms and is correlated with cooperativeness may have important implications for the outcome of cooperative interactions.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdultFemaleGame TheoryHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26531770
PMCPMC4632011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.