Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26531324›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2015

Sensitivity of tumor motion simulation accuracy to lung biomechanical modeling approaches and parameters.

Joubin Nasehi Tehrani, Yin Yang, Rene Werner, Wei Lu, Daniel Low, Xiaohu Guo, Jing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biomechanics of flail chest injuries: tidal volume and respiratory work changes in multiple segmental rib fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Mechanical signatures in cancer metastasis.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 4D liver tumor localization using cone-beam projections and a biomechanical model.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Biomechanical Modeling Guided CBCT Estimation Technique.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A Novel Respiratory Motion Perturbation Model Adaptable to Patient Breathing Irregularities.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joubin Nasehi TehraniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Yin YangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Rene WernerDepartment of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Wei LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Daniel LowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Xiaohu GuoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Texas, Dallas, TX 75080, USA.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

Funding

Next generation 4D-CBCT for lung cancer radiation therapyR01EB020366 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, JING · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA)-based biomechanical modeling can be used to predict lung respiratory motion. In this technique, elastic models and biomechanical parameters are two important factors that determine modeling accuracy. We systematically evaluated the effects of lung and lung tumor biomechanical modeling approaches and related parameters to improve the accuracy of motion simulation of lung tumor center of mass (TCM) displacements. Experiments were conducted with four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). A Quasi-Newton FEA was performed to simulate lung and related tumor displacements between end-expiration (phase 50%) and other respiration phases (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%). Both linear isotropic and non-linear hyperelastic materials, including the neo-Hookean compressible and uncoupled Mooney-Rivlin models, were used to create a finite element model (FEM) of lung and tumors. Lung surface displacement vector fields (SDVFs) were obtained by registering the 50% phase CT to other respiration phases, using the non-rigid demons registration algorithm. The obtained SDVFs were used as lung surface displacement boundary conditions in FEM. The sensitivity of TCM displacement to lung and tumor biomechanical parameters was assessed in eight patients for all three models. Patient-specific optimal parameters were estimated by minimizing the TCM motion simulation errors between phase 50% and phase 0%. The uncoupled Mooney-Rivlin material model showed the highest TCM motion simulation accuracy. The average TCM motion simulation absolute errors for the Mooney-Rivlin material model along left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions were 0.80 mm, 0.86 mm, and 1.51 mm, respectively. The proposed strategy provides a reliable method to estimate patient-specific biomechanical parameters in FEM for lung tumor motion simulation.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalRespiratory MechanicsAlgorithmsFinite Element AnalysisFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansLung NeoplasmsMovementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRespiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques

Identifiers

PMID26531324
PMCPMC4652597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.