ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016
Introducing a true minimally invasive meshless and dissectionless anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is Transvaginal Minimally Invasive Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation a Safe and Effective Surgical Approach for Treating Recurrent Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF): an old method with new horizons.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Genital Prolapse Surgery: What Options Do We Have in the Age of Mesh Issues?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Current Role of Hysterectomy in Pelvic Floor Surgery: Time for Reappraisal? A Review of Current Literature and Expert Discussion.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- Safety and short term outcomes of a new truly minimallyinvasive mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse apical repair.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to demonstrate the biomechanical properties, feasibility, and potential advantages over conventional techniques of this new anchoring device, NeuGuide™.
methodsWe evaluated the pull-out forces required to pull the NeuGuide™ anchor elements from a uniform porcine ligament and a cadaver ligament. We also evaluated the function of the NeuGuide™ and the characteristics of the device for the establishment of verification evidence ensuring the reliability and feasibility of the device. We also evaluated the safety and performance of the NeuGuide™ procedure in female cadavers by palpating the sacro-spinous ligament in real time. We assessed the ability to deploy and fixate the anchor to the sacro-spinous ligament and to stitch the sutures from both sides of the vaginal apex to the cervix, without damaging the surrounding structures.
resultsAll 12 anchors were inserted into the porcine ligament and the cadaver sacro-spinous ligaments successfully (mean pull-out force 34.13 ± 4.32 and 35.68 ± 9.28 respectively). None of the measured forces were below 20 N. No statistically significant difference was noted in the pull-out forces between the porcine and the cadavers (p = 0.60), between the two cadavers (p = 0.19) and between the right and left sacro-spinous ligaments. No abnormalities or malfunctions were noted in the functional performance of the device. Upon laparotomy, dissection of the cadavers revealed that the sacro-spinous ligaments were reached safely with no damage to the surrounding organs and tissues.
conclusionsThis novel anchoring device (NeuGuide™) is aimed at facilitating a durable, easy, and short procedure for sacro-spinous ligament fixation with hypothetically fewer operative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.