Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26531297›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016

Introducing a true minimally invasive meshless and dissectionless anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Masha Tsivian, Adi Y Weintraub, Menahem Neuman, Alex Tsivian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masha TsivianDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adi Y WeintraubDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel. adiyehud@bgu.ac.il.
Menahem NeumanUrogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Hospital, and the Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Alex TsivianDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Assuta Medical Center · ILBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILTel Aviv University · ILWolfson Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to demonstrate the biomechanical properties, feasibility, and potential advantages over conventional techniques of this new anchoring device, NeuGuide™.

methodsWe evaluated the pull-out forces required to pull the NeuGuide™ anchor elements from a uniform porcine ligament and a cadaver ligament. We also evaluated the function of the NeuGuide™ and the characteristics of the device for the establishment of verification evidence ensuring the reliability and feasibility of the device. We also evaluated the safety and performance of the NeuGuide™ procedure in female cadavers by palpating the sacro-spinous ligament in real time. We assessed the ability to deploy and fixate the anchor to the sacro-spinous ligament and to stitch the sutures from both sides of the vaginal apex to the cervix, without damaging the surrounding structures.

resultsAll 12 anchors were inserted into the porcine ligament and the cadaver sacro-spinous ligaments successfully (mean pull-out force 34.13 ± 4.32 and 35.68 ± 9.28 respectively). None of the measured forces were below 20 N. No statistically significant difference was noted in the pull-out forces between the porcine and the cadavers (p = 0.60), between the two cadavers (p = 0.19) and between the right and left sacro-spinous ligaments. No abnormalities or malfunctions were noted in the functional performance of the device. Upon laparotomy, dissection of the cadavers revealed that the sacro-spinous ligaments were reached safely with no damage to the surrounding organs and tissues.

conclusionsThis novel anchoring device (NeuGuide™) is aimed at facilitating a durable, easy, and short procedure for sacro-spinous ligament fixation with hypothetically fewer operative complications.

Indexed as

Suture AnchorsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleHumansLigamentsMaterials TestingPelvic Organ ProlapseProsthesis FailureStress, MechanicalSwineAnchoring deviceBiomechanical propertiesNeuGuide™Sacro-spinous ligament fixation

Identifiers

PMID26531297
OpenAlexW2168451831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.