ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2015
Augmented reality and cone beam CT guidance for transoral robotic surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- More than meets the eye: Augmented reality in surgical oncology.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Augmented Reality (AR) for Surgical Robotic and Autonomous Systems: State of the Art, Challenges, and Solutions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Current state of the art in the use of augmented reality in dentistry: a systematic review of the literature.BMC oral health · 2019Pooled it
- A framework for delivering real-time, instrument-relative navigation in transoral robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- The application of augmented reality in robotic general surgery: A mini-review.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
- From microscope to head-mounted display: integrating hand tracking into microsurgical augmented reality.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Stereoscopic calibration for augmented reality visualization in microscopic surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Towards transcervical ultrasound image guidance for transoral robotic surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Review
- Tongue Contour Tracking and Segmentation in Lingual Ultrasound for Speech Recognition: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The current status and future prospects for molecular imaging-guided precision surgery.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022Review
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Augmented Fluoroscopy Improves the Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Biopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Accuracy of Robotic-Assisted Spinal Surgery-Comparison to TJR Robotics, da Vinci Robotics, and Optoelectronic Laboratory Robotics.International journal of spine surgery · 2021Article
- Augmented Reality and Intraoperative Navigation in Sinonasal Malignancies: A Preclinical Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Commentary: 3D Laparoscopy-Assisted Operation to Adult Intussusceptions During Perioperative Period of Liver Transplantation: Case Report and Literature Review.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- [Application of mixed reality in oromaxillofacial head and neck oncology surgery: a preliminary study].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2020Article
- Augmented reality for image guidance in transoral robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2020Article
- Functional Organ Preservation Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer: Transoral Robotic Surgery and Beyond.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Article
- Robotics in otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In transoral robotic surgery preoperative image data do not reflect large deformations of the operative workspace from perioperative setup. To address this challenge, in this study we explore image guidance with cone beam computed tomographic angiography to guide the dissection of critical vascular landmarks and resection of base-of-tongue neoplasms with adequate margins for transoral robotic surgery. We identify critical vascular landmarks from perioperative c-arm imaging to augment the stereoscopic view of a da Vinci si robot in addition to incorporating visual feedback from relative tool positions. Experiments resecting base-of-tongue mock tumors were conducted on a series of ex vivo and in vivo animal models comparing the proposed workflow for video augmentation to standard non-augmented practice and alternative, fluoroscopy-based image guidance. Accurate identification of registered augmented critical anatomy during controlled arterial dissection and en bloc mock tumor resection was possible with the augmented reality system. The proposed image-guided robotic system also achieved improved resection ratios of mock tumor margins (1.00) when compared to control scenarios (0.0) and alternative methods of image guidance (0.58). The experimental results show the feasibility of the proposed workflow and advantages of cone beam computed tomography image guidance through video augmentation of the primary stereo endoscopy as compared to control and alternative navigation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.