Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26531200›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2015

Oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a multiracial Asian population.

Low Wei Xiang Alvin, Sim Hong Gee, Huang Hong Hong, Cheng Wai Sam Christopher, Ho Sien Sun Henry, Lau Kam On Weber, Tan Puay Hoon, Lee Lui Shiong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Low Wei Xiang AlvinDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, The Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. alvinlwx@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-9678
Sim Hong GeeDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, The Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Huang Hong HongDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, The Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Cheng Wai Sam ChristopherDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, The Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Ho Sien Sun HenryDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, The Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Lau Kam On WeberDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, The Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Tan Puay HoonDepartment of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Lee Lui ShiongDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, The Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. lee.lui.shiong@sgh.com.sg.
Singapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the oncological outcomes of RARP in a multiracial Asian population from a single institution. All suitable patients from 1st January 2003-30th June 2013 were identified from a prospectively maintained cancer registry. Peri-operative and oncological outcomes were analysed. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. There were n = 725 patients identified with a mean follow-up duration 28 months. The mean operative time, EBL and LOS were 186 min, 215 ml and 3 days, respectively. The pathological stage was pT2 in 68.6% (n = 497/725), pT3 in 31.3% (n = 227/725) and n = 1 patient with pT4 disease. The pathological Gleason scores (GS) were 6 in 27.9% (n = 202/725), GS 7 in 63.6% (n = 461/725) and GS ≥ 8 in 8.0 % (n = 58/725). The node positivity rate was 5.8% (n = 21/360). The positive margin rates were 31.0% (n = 154/497) and 70.9% (n = 161/227) for pT2 and pT3, respectively, and decreasing PSM rates are observed with surgical maturity. The biochemical recurrence rates were 9.7% (n = 48/497) and 34.2% (n = 78/228) for pT2 and pT3/T4, respectively. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of BCR were pathological T stage and pathological Gleason score. Post-operatively, 78.5% (n = 569/725) of patients had no complications and 17.7% (n = 128/725) had minor (Clavien grade I-II) complications. This series, representing the largest from Southeast Asia, suggests that RARP can be a safe and oncologically feasible treatment for localised prostate cancer in an institution with moderate workload.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAsian PeopleChinaHumansIndiaMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProstatic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAsian populationLocalised diseaseOncological outcomesProstate cancerRobotic prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID26531200
OpenAlexW2110625832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.