Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26530986›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015

The responsiveness of the EQ-5D and time trade-off scores in schizophrenia, affective disorders, and alcohol addiction.

Michael Sonntag, Hans-Helmut König, Alexander Konnopka

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients following total hip or knee replacement.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael SonntagDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. mi.sonntag@uke.de.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. h.koenig@uke.de.
Alexander KonnopkaDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. a.konnopka@uke.de.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the responsiveness of the EQ-5D index (German and British tariff), the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), and time trade-off (TTO) scores in schizophrenia, affective disorders, and alcohol addiction.

methodsWe used a sample of 502 patients and examined the measures at baseline and after 14 months. We used the generic "WHO Quality of Life BREF" (WHOQOL) and the disorder-specific "Global Severity Index" (GSI) as anchors for a relevant improvement in a patient's health status. In a complete case analysis, we assessed the responsiveness, which is the ability to detect a change given a relevant change on the anchor. We computed the effect sizes (ESs) and standardised response means (SRMs).

resultsIn patients with schizophrenia, the ESs and SRMs were large (ES/SRM > 0.8) for the British EQ-5D index (ESGSI: 0.93; SRMGSI: 0.89; SRMWHOQOL: 0.82). In patients with affective disorders, we found large ESs and SRMs for the EQ VAS (ESGSI: 1.79; ESWHOQOL: 0.90; SRMGSI: 1.52; SRMWHOQOL: 0.93) and a large ES for the British EQ-5D index (ESGSI: 0.88). In patients with alcohol addiction, the ESs and SRMs were large for the EQ VAS (ESGSI: 1.40; ESWHOQOL: 0.94; SRMGSI: 1.04; SRMWHOQOL: 0.83). The ESs and SRMs of the German EQ-5D index were consistently lower than those of the British EQ-5D index. Regarding TTO score, ESs and SRMs were generally less than 0.5.

conclusionsNo preference-based instrument was consistently more responsive than others across all mental disorders. While the EQ VAS was the most responsive instrument in patients with affective disorders or alcohol addiction, the British EQ-5D index was reasonably responsive in patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholismFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMood DisordersPsychometricsPsychotherapyQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSchizophreniaSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID26530986
PMCPMC4632463
OpenAlexW2288551834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.