Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26530740›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2015

Radiation Therapy Intensification for Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.

Kosj Yamoah, Timothy N Showalter, Nitin Ohri

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plasma-based biomaterials for the treatment of cutaneous radiation injury.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kosj YamoahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Timothy N ShowalterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Nitin OhriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. Electronic address: ohri.nitin@gmail.com.

Funding

Paul Calabresis Career Development Award For Clinical Oncology K12CA132783 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI PEREZ-SOLER, ROMAN, VERMA, AMIT K. · 2009 to 2019
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA132783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the outcomes of randomized trials testing radiation therapy (RT) intensification, including both dose escalation and/or the use of altered fractionation, as a strategy to improve disease control for a number of malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a literature search to identify randomized trials testing RT intensification for cancers of the central nervous system, head and neck, breast, lung, esophagus, rectum, and prostate. Findings were described qualitatively. Where adequate data were available, pooled estimates for the effect of RT intensification on local control (LC) or overall survival (OS) were obtained using the inverse variance method.

resultsIn primary central nervous system tumors, esophageal cancer, and rectal cancer, randomized trials have not demonstrated that RT intensification improves clinical outcomes. In breast cancer and prostate cancer, dose escalation has been shown to improve LC or biochemical disease control but not OS. Radiation therapy intensification may improve LC and OS in head and neck and lung cancers, but these benefits have generally been limited to studies that did not incorporate concurrent chemotherapy.

conclusionsIn randomized trials, the benefits of RT intensification have largely been restricted to trials in which concurrent chemotherapy was not used. Novel strategies to optimize the incorporation of RT in the multimodality treatment of solid tumors should be explored.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, RadiationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBreast NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageRectal NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26530740
PMCPMC4635974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.