ReviewSkeletal radiology2016
Benign and malignant tumors of the foot and ankle.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distribution Patterns of Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of the Forefoot and Midfoot: A 12.5-Year Study at a University Hospital.Foot & ankle specialist · 2026Article
- Insights into the Distribution Patterns of Foot and Ankle Tumours: Update on the Perspective of a University Tumour Institute.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Benign tumours of foot and ankle.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- Postoperative clinical and functional outcomes in patients with tumor and tumor-like lesion of foot and ankle.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2022Article
- Surgical excision of complex lipoma from the foot: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings Differentiating Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma from Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Head and Neck Region.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- MRI imaging of soft tissue tumours of the foot and ankle.Insights into imaging · 2019Review
- [Foot and ankle tumours : Part II: Malignant bone tumours and soft tissue tumours of the foot with differential diagnostic hints].Der Radiologe · 2018Review
- [Foot and ankle tumours : Part I: overview of incidence, diagnosis and staging of pedal tumours].Der Radiologe · 2018Review
- Imaging appearances of soft-tissue tumors of the pediatric foot: review of a 15-year experience at a tertiary pediatric hospital.Pediatric radiology · 2017Review
- Malignant tumours of the foot and ankle.EFORT open reviews · 2017Article
- Bone tumors of the pediatric foot: imaging appearances.Pediatric radiology · 2017Review
- Review of Soft Tissue Masses of the Foot and Ankle: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain and focal masses in the foot and ankle are frequently encountered and often initiate a workup including imaging. It is important to differentiate benign lesions from aggressive benign or malignant lesions. In this review, multiple examples of osseous and soft tissue tumors of the foot and ankle will be presented. Additionally, the compartmental anatomy of the foot and ankle will be discussed in terms of its relevance for percutaneous biopsy planning and eventual surgery. Finally, a general overview of the surgical management of benign, benign aggressive and malignant tumors of the foot and ankle will be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.