Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26530386›Full record

ArticlemBio2015

Preclinical Evaluations To Identify Optimal Linezolid Regimens for Tuberculosis Therapy.

Ashley N Brown, George L Drusano, Jonathan R Adams, Jaime L Rodriquez, Kalyani Jambunathan, Dodge L Baluya, David L Brown, Awewura Kwara, Jon C Mirsalis, Richard Hafner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The ameliorative effects ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley N BrownDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA Ashley.Brown@medicine.ufl.edu.
George L DrusanoDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jonathan R AdamsDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jaime L RodriquezDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Kalyani JambunathanBiosciences Division, SRI International, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
Dodge L BaluyaDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
David L BrownDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Awewura KwaraAlpert Medical School, Division of Infectious Diseases, Brown University, Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Jon C MirsalisBiosciences Division, SRI International, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
Richard HafnerDivision of AIDS, NIAID, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Arnold LouieDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
University of Florida · USInstitute for Learning Innovation · USSRI International · USBrown University · USOffice of AIDS Research · US

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400006CNIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI-042853PHS HHS HHSN266200700043CPHS HHS HHSN272201400006I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledLinezolid is an oxazolidinone with potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Linezolid toxicity in patients correlates with the dose and duration of therapy. These toxicities are attributable to the inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis. Clinically relevant linezolid regimens were simulated in the in vitro hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) system to identify the linezolid therapies that minimize toxicity, maximize antibacterial activity, and prevent drug resistance. Linezolid inhibited mitochondrial proteins in an exposure-dependent manner, with toxicity being driven by trough concentrations. Once-daily linezolid killed M. tuberculosis in an exposure-dependent manner. Further, 300 mg linezolid given every 12 hours generated more bacterial kill but more toxicity than 600 mg linezolid given once daily. None of the regimens prevented linezolid resistance. These findings show that with linezolid monotherapy, a clear tradeoff exists between antibacterial activity and toxicity. By identifying the pharmacokinetic parameters linked with toxicity and antibacterial activity, these data can provide guidance for clinical trials evaluating linezolid in multidrug antituberculosis regimens. IMPORTANCE: The emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis are a major threat to global public health. Linezolid is an oxazolidinone that is licensed for human use and has demonstrated potent activity against multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis. However, long-term use of linezolid has shown to be toxic in patients, often resulting in thrombocytopenia. We examined therapeutic linezolid regimens in an in vitro model to characterize the exposure-toxicity relationship. The antibacterial activity against M. tuberculosis was also assessed for these regimens, including the amplification or suppression of resistant mutant subpopulations by the chosen regimen. Higher exposures of linezolid resulted in greater antibacterial activity, but with more toxicity and, for some regimens, increased resistant mutant subpopulation amplification, illustrating the trade-off between activity and toxicity. These findings can provide valuable insight for designing optimal dosage regimens for linezolid that are part of the long combination courses used to treat multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsCell LineCell SurvivalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansLinezolidMicrobial ViabilityModels, BiologicalMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsLinezolid

Identifiers

PMID26530386
PMCPMC4631805
OpenAlexW2242834633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.