ArticlemBio2015
The Consequences of Replicating in the Wrong Orientation: Bacterial Chromosome Duplication without an Active Replication Origin.
Article in mBio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topoisomerase III limits RecA-dependent DNA amplification in the chromosome terminus with RecG.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- RecBCD-dependent post-UV replication restart inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Termination of DNA replication drives genomic instability via multiple mechanisms.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- UV induces codirectional replication-transcription conflicts and an alternative DnaA-dependent replication origin in the rnhAB mutants of Escherichiacoli.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Pathological R-loops in bacteria from engineered expression of endogenous antisense RNAs whose synthesis is ordinarily terminated by Rho.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Escherichia coli DNA replication: the old model organism still holds many surprises.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- RecA and SSB genome-wide distribution in ssDNA gaps and ends in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Characterization of a pathway of genomic instability induced by R-loops and its regulation by topoisomerases in E. coli.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Strand specificity of ribonucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Interplay between chromosomal architecture and termination of DNA replication in bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- The Impact of RNA-DNA Hybrids on Genome Integrity in Bacteria.Annual review of microbiology · 2022Review
- Role for DNA double strand end-resection activity of RecBCD in control of aberrant chromosomal replication initiation in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Topoisomerase I Essentiality, DnaA-Independent Chromosomal Replication, and Transcription-Replication Conflict in Escherichia coli.Journal of bacteriology · 2021Article
- A Fork Trap in the Chromosomal Termination Area Is Highly Conserved across AllInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Interaction with single-stranded DNA-binding protein localizes ribonuclease HI to DNA replication forks and facilitates R-loop removal.Molecular microbiology · 2020Article
- The Roles of Bacterial DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Proteins in Chromosomal DNA Replication.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Supercoiling, R-loops, Replication and the Functions of Bacterial Type 1A Topoisomerases.Genes · 2020Review
- Laboratory Evolution Experiments Help Identify a Predominant Region of Constitutive Stable DNA Replication Initiation.mSphere · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledChromosome replication is regulated in all organisms at the assembly stage of the replication machinery at specific origins. In Escherichia coli, the DnaA initiator protein regulates the assembly of replication forks at oriC. This regulation can be undermined by defects in nucleic acid metabolism. In cells lacking RNase HI, replication initiates independently of DnaA and oriC, presumably at persisting R-loops. A similar mechanism was assumed for origin-independent synthesis in cells lacking RecG. However, recently we suggested that this synthesis initiates at intermediates resulting from replication fork fusions. Here we present data suggesting that in cells lacking RecG or RNase HI, origin-independent synthesis arises by different mechanisms, indicative of these two proteins having different roles in vivo. Our data support the idea that RNase HI processes R-loops, while RecG is required to process replication fork fusion intermediates. However, regardless of how origin-independent synthesis is initiated, a fraction of forks will proceed in an orientation opposite to normal. We show that the resulting head-on encounters with transcription threaten cell viability, especially if taking place in highly transcribed areas. Thus, despite their different functions, RecG and RNase HI are both important factors for maintaining replication control and orientation. Their absence causes severe replication problems, highlighting the advantages of the normal chromosome arrangement, which exploits a single origin to control the number of forks and their orientation relative to transcription, and a defined termination area to contain fork fusions. Any changes to this arrangement endanger cell cycle control, chromosome dynamics, and, ultimately, cell viability. IMPORTANCE: Cell division requires unwinding of millions of DNA base pairs to generate the template for RNA transcripts as well as chromosome replication. As both processes use the same template, frequent clashes are unavoidable. To minimize the impact of these clashes, transcription and replication in bacteria follow the same directionality, thereby avoiding head-on collisions. This codirectionality is maintained by a strict regulation of where replication is started. We have used Escherichia coli as a model to investigate cells in which the defined location of replication initiation is compromised. In cells lacking either RNase HI or RecG, replication initiates away from the defined replication origin, and we discuss the different mechanisms by which this synthesis arises. In addition, the resulting forks proceed in a direction opposite to normal, thereby inducing head-on collisions between transcription and replication, and we show that the resulting consequences are severe enough to threaten the viability of cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.