Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26530293›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2016

Should patients with laryngeal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma receive prophylactic cranial irradiation?

Andrés Coca-Pelaz, Kenneth O Devaney, Juan P Rodrigo, Gyorgy B Halmos, Primož Strojan, William M Mendenhall, Avraham Eisbruch, Robert Smee, Kimihide Kusafuka, Alessandra Rinaldo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Andrés Coca-PelazDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Kenneth O DevaneyDepartment of Pathology, Allegiance Health, Jackson, MI, USA.
Juan P RodrigoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Gyorgy B HalmosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Primož StrojanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
William M MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Avraham EisbruchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Robert SmeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kimihide KusafukaPathology Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan.
Alessandra RinaldoUniversity of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy.
Alfio FerlitoCoordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy. a.ferlito@uniud.it.
Henry Ford Allegiance Health · USHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIPrince of Wales Hospital · AUShizuoka Cancer Center · JPUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNCs) most often arise in the lung, extrapulmonary SCNCs arise in a variety of locations-including the head and neck region. In particular, laryngeal SCNCs-while rare tumors-are nevertheless recognized as distinct lesions. The rarity of laryngeal SCNC gives rise to two distinct difficulties: first (particularly with small biopsy specimens), laryngeal SCNC can be difficult to diagnose by routine light microscopy; second, limited experience with these tumors can make the crafting of a treatment plan for individual patients difficult. As regards the first problem, pathologic diagnosis is greatly enhanced by the application of immunohistochemistry. The second problem-crafting a successful treatment strategy-presents a much larger difficulty. It is tempting to extrapolate from experience with the (more common) pulmonary SCNC in search of a strategy applicable to laryngeal SCNC; such an extrapolation, however, may not be uniformly successful. In particular, while a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy appears to be as valuable in the treatment of extrapulmonary as it is in the treatment of pulmonary SCNC, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI)-which has enjoyed some success in the treatment of some patients with pulmonary SCNC-does not appear to have similar utility in patients with laryngeal SCNC. Accordingly, the use of PCI does not appear to have a role to play at this point in time in the treatment of patients with laryngeal SCNC.

Indexed as

Cranial IrradiationBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinoma, Small CellHumansImmunohistochemistryLaryngeal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedBrain metastasesExtrapulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinomaLarynxNeuroendocrine neoplasmsProphylactic cranial irradiation

Identifiers

PMID26530293
OpenAlexW2280941548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.