Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26530165›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2016

Oral supplementations with L-glutamine or L-alanyl-L-glutamine do not change metabolic alterations induced by long-term high-fat diet in the B6.129F2/J mouse model of insulin resistance.

Patricia Martins Bock, Mauricio Krause, Helena Trevisan Schroeder, Gabriela Fernandes Hahn, Hilton Kenji Takahashi, Cinthia Maria Schöler, Graziella Nicoletti, Luiz Domingos Zavarize Neto, Maria Inês Lavina Rodrigues, Maciel Alencar Bruxel and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exercise, heat shock proteins and insulin resistance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patricia Martins BockLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Mauricio KrauseLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Helena Trevisan SchroederLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Gabriela Fernandes HahnLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Hilton Kenji TakahashiLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Cinthia Maria SchölerLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Graziella NicolettiLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Luiz Domingos Zavarize NetoLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Maria Inês Lavina RodriguesLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Maciel Alencar BruxelLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil.
Paulo Ivo Homem de BittencourtLaboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Sarmento Leite, 500, 2nd floor, suite 350, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, Brazil. pauloivo@ufrgs.br.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we aimed to investigate the effects of long-term supplementations with L-glutamine or L-alanyl-L-glutamine in the high-fat diet (HFD)-fed B6.129SF2/J mouse model over insulin sensitivity response and signaling, oxidative stress markers, metabolism and HSP70 expression. Mice were fed in a standard low-fat diet (STA) or a HFD for 20 weeks. In the 21th week, mice from the HFD group were allocated in five groups and supplemented for additional 8 weeks with different amino acids: HFD control group (HFD-Con), HFD + dipeptide L-alanyl-L-glutamine group (HFD-Dip), HFD + L-alanine group (HFD-Ala), HFD + L-glutamine group (HFD-Gln), or the HFD + L-alanine + L-glutamine (in their free forms) group (HFD-Ala + Gln). HFD induced higher body weight, fat pad, fasted glucose, and total cholesterol in comparison with STA group. Amino acid supplementations did not induce any modifications in these parameters. Although insulin tolerance tests indicated insulin resistance in all HFD groups, amino acid supplementations did not improve insulin sensitivity in the present model. There were also no significant differences in the immunocontents of insulin receptor, Akt, and Toll-like receptor-4. Notably, total 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSP72 + HSP73) contents in the liver was markedly increased in HFD-Con group as compared to STA group, which might suggest that insulin resistance is only in the beginning. Apparently, B6.129SF2/J mice are more resistant to the harmful effects of HFD through a mechanism that may include gut adaptation, reducing the absorption of nutrients, including amino acids, which may explain the lack of improvements in our intervention.

Indexed as

Diet, High-FatDisease Models, AnimalInsulin ResistanceAdministration, OralAnimalsGlutamineMiceGlutamineAlanyl-glutamineGlutamineHigh-fat dietHSP70Insulin resistanceObesity

Identifiers

PMID26530165
OpenAlexW2464508617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.