Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26530113›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2015

Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?

Grish P Joshi, Thomas Jaschinski, Francis Bonnet, Henrik Kehlet, PROSPECT collaboration

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03824808 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion to Decrease Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption After Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy and Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03824808 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion to Decrease Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption After Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy and Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled21ConditionsKidney Cancer, Prostate CancerArmsLidocaine Hydrochloride 0.8% in Dextrose 5% Solution, 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Opioid use after uro-oncologic surgeries in time of opioid crisis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Grish P JoshiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9068, USA. girish.joshi@utsouthwestern.edu.
Thomas JaschinskiInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Francis BonnetDepartment d' Anesthesie Reanimation, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Université Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Henrik KehletSection for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PROSPECT collaboration
Sorbonne Université · FRThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncrease in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has increased the incidence of radical prostatectomy. However, the literature assessing pain therapy for this procedure has not been systematically evaluated. Thus, optimal pain therapy for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy remains controversial.

methodsMedline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies assessing the effects of analgesic and anesthetic interventions on pain after radical prostatectomy. All searches were conducted in October 2012 and updated in June 2015.

resultsMost treatments studied improved pain relief and/or reduced opioid requirements. However, there were significant differences in the study designs and the variables evaluated, precluding quantitative analysis and consensus recommendations.

conclusionsThis systematic review reveals that there is a lack of evidence to develop an optimal pain management protocol in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Most studies assessed unimodal analgesic approaches rather than a multimodal technique. There is a need for more procedure-specific studies comparing pain and analgesic requirements for open and minimally invasive surgical procedures. Finally, while we wait for appropriate procedure specific evidence from publication of adequate studies assessing optimal pain management after radical prostatectomy, we propose a basic analgesic guideline.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnestheticsHumansMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative PainPractice Guidelines as TopicProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID26530113
PMCPMC4632348
OpenAlexW2168254563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.