Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26530077›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International AIDS Society2015

Animal and human mucosal tissue models to study HIV biomedical interventions: can we predict success?

Charlene S Dezzutti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bridging the gap: large animal models in neurodegenerative research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Charlene S DezzuttiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreclinical testing plays an integral role in the development of HIV prevention modalities. Several models are used including humanized mice, non-human primates and human mucosal tissue cultures. DISCUSSION: Pharmaceutical development traditionally uses preclinical models to evaluate product safety. The HIV prevention field has extended this paradigm to include models of efficacy, encompassing humanized mice, non-human primates (typically Asian macaques) and human mucosal tissue (such as cervical and colorectal). As our understanding of the biology of HIV transmission improves and includes the influence of human behaviour/biology and co-pathogens, these models have evolved as well to address more complex questions. These three models have demonstrated the effectiveness of systemic (oral) and topical use of antiretroviral drugs. Importantly, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships are being developed and linked to information gathered from human clinical trials. The models are incorporating co-pathogens (bacterial and viral) and the effects of coitus (mucosal fluids) on drug distribution and efficacy. Humanized mice are being tailored in their immune reconstitution to better represent humans. Importantly, human mucosal tissue cultures are now being used in early clinical trials to provide information on product efficacy to more accurately characterize efficacious products to advance to larger clinical trials. While all of these models have made advancements in product development, each has limitations and the data need to be interpreted by keeping these limitations in mind.

conclusionsDevelopment and refinement of each of these models has been an iterative process and linkages to data generated among each of them and from human clinical trials are needed to determine their reliability. Preclinical testing has evolved from simply identifying products that demonstrate efficacy prior to clinical trials to defining essential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships under a variety of conditions and has the potential to improve product selection prior to the initiation of large-scale human clinical trials. The goal is to provide researchers with ample information to make conversant decisions that guide optimized and efficient product development.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsHIV InfectionsHumansMacacaMiceMucous MembraneAnti-Infective Agentsex vivo challengeHIV preventionhumanized mousemacaquemicrobicidemucosal tissuenon-human primatepre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID26530077
PMCPMC4631705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.