Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26529364›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2016

Regulation and Functional Implications of Opioid Receptor Splicing in Opioid Pharmacology and HIV Pathogenesis.

Patrick M Regan, Dianne Langford, Kamel Khalili

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. L-asparaginase induces IP3R-mediated ER CaCell death discovery · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New insights on CRISPR/Cas9-based therapy for breast Cancer.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick M ReganDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Neurovirology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dianne LangfordDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Neurovirology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kamel KhaliliDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Neurovirology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Temple University · US

Funding

Viral Gene Editing and Bioinformatics Core for Institution # 269291P30MH092177 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Ilker Kudret Sariyer · 2011 to 2026
$24.9M
Project 3 Dysregulation of metabolic communication of oligodendrocytes and neurons by cocaine and TatP01DA037830 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI KHALILI, KAMEL · 2015 to 2019
$7.4M
OPIOIDS IN AIDS PROGRESSION AND NEUROPATHOGENESIS OF SIV INFECTED MACAQUESP01DA023860 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI FISCHER, TRACY · 2008 to 2012
$7.0M
Interdisciplinary And Translational Research Training In NeurohivT32MH079785 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Kamel Khalili · 2008 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA023860NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA037830NIMH NIH HHS 5T32MH079785NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH092177NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH079785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the identification and characterization of four opioid receptor subtypes and the genes from which they are encoded, pharmacological data does not conform to the predications of a four opioid receptor model. Instead, current studies of opioid pharmacology suggest the existence of additional receptor subtypes; however, no additional opioid receptor subtype has been identified to date. It is now understood that this discrepancy is due to the generation of multiple isoforms of opioid receptor subtypes. While several mechanisms are utilized to generate these isoforms, the primary mechanism involves alternative splicing of the pre-mRNA transcript. Extensive alternative splicing patterns for opioid receptors have since been identified and discrepancies in opioid pharmacology are now partially attributed to variable expression of these isoforms. Recent studies have been successful in characterizing the localization of these isoforms as well as their specificity in ligand binding; however, the regulation of opioid receptor splicing specificity is poorly characterized. Furthermore, the functional significance of individual receptor isoforms and the extent to which opioid- and/or HIV-mediated changes in the opioid receptor isoform profile contributes to altered opioid pharmacology or the well-known physiological role of opioids in the exacerbation of HIV neurocognitive dysfunction is unknown. As such, the current review details constitutive splicing mechanisms as well as the specific architecture of opioid receptor genes, transcripts, and receptors in order to highlight the current understanding of opioid receptor isoforms, potential mechanisms of their regulation and signaling, and their functional significance in both opioid pharmacology and HIV-associated neuropathology.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHIV InfectionsHumansProtein IsoformsReceptors, OpioidRNA SplicingStructure-Activity RelationshipAnalgesics, OpioidProtein IsoformsReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID26529364
PMCPMC4728022
OpenAlexW1948794003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.