Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26529285›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2016

Osteopontin is a proximal effector of leptin-mediated non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fibrosis.

Jason D Coombes, Steve S Choi, Marzena Swiderska-Syn, Paul Manka, Danielle T Reid, Elena Palma, Marco A Briones-Orta, Guanhua Xie, Rasha Younis, Naoto Kitamura and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Mechanisms and therapeutic insights into MASH-associated fibrosis.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Osteopontin Promotes Cholangiocyte Secretion of Chemokines to Support Macrophage Recruitment and Fibrosis in MASH.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Jason D CoombesRegeneration and Repair Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK; Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, King's College London, UK.
Steve S ChoiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Durham Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Marzena Swiderska-SynDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA.
Paul MankaRegeneration and Repair Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Danielle T ReidSnyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Health Research and Innovation Centre (HRIC), University of Calgary, Canada.
Elena PalmaDivision of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, King's College London, UK; Viral Hepatitis and Alcohol Research Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK.
Marco A Briones-OrtaRegeneration and Repair Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK; Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, King's College London, UK.
Guanhua XieDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA.
Rasha YounisRegeneration and Repair Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK.
Naoto KitamuraRegeneration and Repair Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK.
Marco Della PerutaViral Hepatitis and Alcohol Research Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK.
Shanna BitencourtLiver Cell Biology Lab (LIVR), Department of Cell Biology (CYTO), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurent DolléLiver Cell Biology Lab (LIVR), Department of Cell Biology (CYTO), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ye Htun OoCentre for Liver Research and NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Zhiyong MiDepartment of Surgery, Loyola University, Chicago, USA.
Paul C KuoDepartment of Surgery, Loyola University, Chicago, USA.
Roger WilliamsRegeneration and Repair Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK; Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, King's College London, UK.
Shilpa ChokshiDivision of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, King's College London, UK; Viral Hepatitis and Alcohol Research Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK.
Ali CanbayDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Lee C ClaridgeLiver Unit, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Bertus EksteenSnyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Health Research and Innovation Centre (HRIC), University of Calgary, Canada.
Anna Mae DiehlDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA.
Wing-Kin SynRegeneration and Repair Group, The Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK; Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, King's College London, UK; Department of Surgery, Loyola University, Chicago, USA; Liver Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Physiology, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain. Electronic address: wsyn@doctors.org.uk.
Duke University · USKing's College London · GBFoundation for Liver Research · GBLoyola University Chicago · USUniversity of Calgary · CAVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEEssen University Hospital · DENIHR Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Hedgehog Signaling and Adult Liver RegenerationR01DK077794 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, ANNA MAE ELIZABETH · 2008 to 2020
$4.6M
Rac1 Promotes Hepatic Stellate Accumulation/Activation in Liver InjuryK08DK080980 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHOI, STEVE S · 2009 to 2013
$567k
Medical Research Council G1002552NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK080980NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK077794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLiver fibrosis develops when hepatic stellate cells (HSC) are activated into collagen-producing myofibroblasts. In non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the adipokine leptin is upregulated, and promotes liver fibrosis by directly activating HSC via the hedgehog pathway. We reported that hedgehog-regulated osteopontin (OPN) plays a key role in promoting liver fibrosis. Herein, we evaluated if OPN mediates leptin-profibrogenic effects in NASH.

methodsLeptin-deficient (ob/ob) and wild-type (WT) mice were fed control or methionine-choline deficient (MCD) diet. Liver tissues were assessed by Sirius-red, OPN and αSMA IHC, and qRT-PCR for fibrogenic genes. In vitro, HSC with stable OPN (or control) knockdown were treated with recombinant (r)leptin and OPN-neutralizing or sham-aptamers. HSC response to OPN loss was assessed by wound healing assay. OPN-aptamers were also added to precision-cut liver slices (PCLS), and administered to MCD-fed WT (leptin-intact) mice to determine if OPN neutralization abrogated fibrogenesis.

resultsMCD-fed WT mice developed NASH-fibrosis, upregulated OPN, and accumulated αSMA+ cells. Conversely, MCD-fed ob/ob mice developed less fibrosis and accumulated fewer αSMA+ and OPN+ cells. In vitro, leptin-treated HSC upregulated OPN, αSMA, collagen 1α1 and TGFβ mRNA by nearly 3-fold, but this effect was blunted by OPN loss. Inhibition of PI3K and transduction of dominant negative-Akt abrogated leptin-mediated OPN induction, while constitutive active-Akt upregulated OPN. Finally, OPN neutralization reduced leptin-mediated fibrogenesis in both PCLS and MCD-fed mice.

conclusionOPN overexpression in NASH enhances leptin-mediated fibrogenesis via PI3K/Akt. OPN neutralization significantly reduces NASH fibrosis, reinforcing the potential utility of targeting OPN in the treatment of patients with advanced NASH.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedGene DeletionHepatocytesLeptinLiverLiver CirrhosisMaleMice, Inbred C57BLNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseOsteopontinPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRats, Sprague-DawleySignal TransductionLeptinOsteopontinPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAdipokineFibrosisHepaticSignaling

Identifiers

PMID26529285
PMCPMC4756594
OpenAlexW2220274989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.