Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26529098›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Influence of Spirituality and Modesty on Acceptance of Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Eileen O Dareng, Elima Jedy-Agba, Patience Bamisaye, Fatima Isa Modibbo, Lawal O Oyeneyin, Ayodele S Adewole, Olayinka B Olaniyan, Patrick S Dakum, Paul D Pharoah, Clement A Adebamowo

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eileen O DarengCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Institute of Human Virology Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Elima Jedy-AgbaInstitute of Human Virology Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria; Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Patience BamisayeInstitute of Human Virology Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria; Department of Nursing Services, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Fatima Isa ModibboDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Lawal O OyeneyinMother and Child Hospital Ondo, Ondo, Nigeria.
Ayodele S AdewoleMother and Child Hospital Ondo, Ondo, Nigeria.
Olayinka B OlaniyanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Patrick S DakumInstitute of Human Virology Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Paul D PharoahCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Clement A AdebamowoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health; Institute of Human Virology and Greenebaum Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

African Collaborative Center for Microbiome and Genomics Research (ACCME)U54HG006947 · NHGRI · INSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY · PI ADEBAMOWO, CLEMENT ADEBAYO · 2013 to 2018
$5.7M
Capacity Development for Research into AIDS Associated malignancies (CADRE)D43CA153792 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ADEBAMOWO, CLEMENT ADEBAYO · 2010 to 2013
$1.8M
Cancer Research UK 10124NCI NIH HHS 1D43CA153792-01NCI NIH HHS D43 CA153792NHGRI NIH HHS 1U54HG006947-01A1NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhereas systematic screening programs have reduced the incidence of cervical cancer in developed countries, the incidence remains high in developing countries. Among several barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening, the roles of religious and cultural factors such as modesty have been poorly studied. Knowledge about these factors is important because of the potential to overcome them using strategies such as self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples. In this study we evaluate the influence of spirituality and modesty on the acceptance of self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. METHODOLOGY: We enrolled 600 participants in Nigeria between August and October 2014 and collected information on spirituality and modesty using two scales. We used principal component analysis to extract scores for spirituality and modesty and logistic regression models to evaluate the association between spirituality, modesty and preference for self-sampling. All analyses were performed using STATA 12 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

resultsSome 581 (97%) women had complete data for analysis. Most (69%) were married, 50% were Christian and 44% were from the south western part of Nigeria. Overall, 19% (110/581) of the women preferred self-sampling to being sampled by a health care provider. Adjusting for age and socioeconomic status, spirituality, religious affiliation and geographic location were significantly associated with preference for self-sampling, while modesty was not significantly associated. The multivariable OR (95% CI, p-value) for association with self-sampling were 0.88 (0.78-0.99, 0.03) for spirituality, 1.69 (1.09-2.64, 0.02) for religious affiliation and 0.96 (0.86-1.08, 0.51) for modesty.

conclusionOur results show the importance of taking cultural and religious beliefs and practices into consideration in planning health interventions like cervical cancer screening. To succeed, public health interventions and the education to promote it must be related to the target population and its preferences.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareSpiritualityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansNigeriaSocioeconomic FactorsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26529098
PMCPMC4631343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.