Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26529062›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2015

Discrimination of germline V genes at different sequencing lengths and mutational burdens: A new tool for identifying and evaluating the reliability of V gene assignment.

Bochao Zhang, Wenzhao Meng, Eline T Luning Prak, Uri Hershberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibody repertoire sequencing analysis.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TCRCell · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Pipeline Repertoire for Ig-Seq Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bochao ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, 711 Bossone Building, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Wenzhao MengDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 405B Stellar Chance Labs, 422 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Eline T Luning PrakDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 405B Stellar Chance Labs, 422 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Uri HershbergSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, 711 Bossone Building, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA. Electronic address: uri.hershberg@drexel.edu.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Transcriptomics and Repertoire ProfilingP01AI106697 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Donna L. Farber · 2013 to 2026
$31.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS P30-CA016520NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI106697NIAID NIH HHS P01AI106697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune repertoires are collections of lymphocytes that express diverse antigen receptor gene rearrangements consisting of Variable (V), (Diversity (D) in the case of heavy chains) and Joining (J) gene segments. Clonally related cells typically share the same germline gene segments and have highly similar junctional sequences within their third complementarity determining regions. Identifying clonal relatedness of sequences is a key step in the analysis of immune repertoires. The V gene is the most important for clone identification because it has the longest sequence and the greatest number of sequence variants. However, accurate identification of a clone's germline V gene source is challenging because there is a high degree of similarity between different germline V genes. This difficulty is compounded in antibodies, which can undergo somatic hypermutation. Furthermore, high-throughput sequencing experiments often generate partial sequences and have significant error rates. To address these issues, we describe a novel method to estimate which germline V genes (or alleles) cannot be discriminated under different conditions (read lengths, sequencing errors or somatic hypermutation frequencies). Starting with any set of germline V genes, this method measures their similarity using different sequencing lengths and calculates their likelihood of unambiguous assignment under different levels of mutation. Hence, one can identify, under different experimental and biological conditions, the germline V genes (or alleles) that cannot be uniquely identified and bundle them together into groups of specific V genes with highly similar sequences.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesMutationAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceGenes, Immunoglobulin Heavy ChainHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataB cellsGene identificationGermline anotationHigh throughput sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26529062
PMCPMC4811607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.