Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26528820›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Etiology of Childhood Infectious Diarrhea in a Developed Region of China: Compared to Childhood Diarrhea in a Developing Region and Adult Diarrhea in a Developed Region.

Xin Wang, Jing Wang, Hao Sun, Shengli Xia, Ran Duan, Junrong Liang, Yuchun Xiao, Haiyan Qiu, Guangliang Shan, Huaiqi Jing

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Identification of Culturable Bacteria andInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global epidemiology of campylobacteriosis and the impact of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Global Prevalence ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xin WangInstitute of Basic Medicine Science, Chinese Academy of Medicine Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medicine College, Beijing, China; National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Infectious Disease, Dongcheng Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Hao SunDepartment of Infectious Disease, Dongcheng Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Shengli XiaDepartment of Infectious Disease, Henan Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Ran DuanNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Junrong LiangNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yuchun XiaoNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Haiyan QiuNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Guangliang ShanInstitute of Basic Medicine Science, Chinese Academy of Medicine Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medicine College, Beijing, China.
Huaiqi JingNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In China, great differences in economy, social characteristics and hygiene exist between developing and developed regions. A comparative study of infectious diarrhea between two regions was needed. Three groups of diarrheal patients were collected: children ≤5 year-olds from Beijing (developed region) and Henan Province (developing region), and adults over 18 year-olds from Beijing. A questionnaire was used to survey and feces samples were examined for 16 enteropathogens. We enrolled 1422 children and 1047 adults from developed region and 755 children from developing region. Virus positive rates were 32.98% for children and 23.67% for adults in developed region. The most prevalent pathogen for children was rotavirus whereas for adults was norovirus. Bacterial isolation rates were 13.92% for children from developed region, while 29.14% for children from the developing regions. For the greatest difference, Shigella accounted for 50.79% and was the dominant pathogen in the developing region, whereas in the developed region it was only 1.45%. There was no significant relationship between the local levels of development with diarrheogenic Escherichia coli (DEC) categories. But it was seen the notable differences between the population with different age: enteropathogenic E.coli (EPEC) and enteroaggregative E.coli (EAggEC) were the primary classes of DEC in children from both regions, whereas it was enterotoxigenic E.coli (ETEC) in adults. The symptoms of Shigella and Salmonella infection, such as bloody stools, white blood cells (WBC) and red blood cells (RBC) positivity and fever were similar in children, which may lead to the misidentification. Yersinia enterocolitica and shiga toxin-producing E.coli (STEC) infections were firstly reported in Beijing. There was a large difference in etiology of bacterial diarrhea between children in developing and developed regions of China.

Indexed as

Diarrhea, InfantileDysentery, BacillaryEscherichia coli InfectionsRural PopulationSalmonella InfectionsUrban PopulationAdultChildChild, PreschoolChinaEscherichia coliFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID26528820
PMCPMC4631449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.