GuidelineJournal of integrative bioinformatics2015
Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology.
Guideline in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable software development in science - insights from 20 years of Vanted.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status, developments, and tools in 2024.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Design considerations for representing systems biology information with the Systems Biology Graphical Notation.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2021.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Mathematical Modelling in Biomedicine: A Primer for the Curious and the Skeptic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2020.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2020Article
- BioHackathon 2015: Semantics of data for life sciences and reproducible research.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2019.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2017.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2018Article
- SBMLPkgSpec: a LaTeX style file for SBML package specification documents.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2016.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2016Article
- The Human Physiome: how standards, software and innovative service infrastructures are providing the building blocks to make it achievable.Interface focus · 2016Review
- Metabolomics, Standards, and Metabolic Modeling for Synthetic Biology in Plants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Standards shape our everyday life. From nuts and bolts to electronic devices and technological processes, standardised products and processes are all around us. Standards have technological and economic benefits, such as making information exchange, production, and services more efficient. However, novel, innovative areas often either lack proper standards, or documents about standards in these areas are not available from a centralised platform or formal body (such as the International Standardisation Organisation). Systems and synthetic biology is a relatively novel area, and it is only in the last decade that the standardisation of data, information, and models related to systems and synthetic biology has become a community-wide effort. Several open standards have been established and are under continuous development as a community initiative. COMBINE, the ‘COmputational Modeling in BIology’ NEtwork has been established as an umbrella initiative to coordinate and promote the development of the various community standards and formats for computational models. There are yearly two meeting, HARMONY (Hackathons on Resources for Modeling in Biology), Hackathon-type meetings with a focus on development of the support for standards, and COMBINE forums, workshop-style events with oral presentations, discussion, poster, and breakout sessions for further developing the standards. For more information see http://co.mbine.org/. So far the different standards were published and made accessible through the standards’ web- pages or preprint services. The aim of this special issue is to provide a single, easily accessible and citable platform for the publication of standards in systems and synthetic biology. This special issue is intended to serve as a central access point to standards and related initiatives in systems and synthetic biology, it will be published annually to provide an opportunity for standard development groups to communicate updated specifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.