ArticleEndoscopy international open2015
Diagnostic values of dual focus narrow band imaging and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in FAP-related duodenal adenoma.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02162173 (Diagnostic Values of Dual Focus Narrow Band Imaging and Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in FAP Related Duodenal Adenoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Values of Dual Focus Narrow Band Imaging and Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in FAP Related Duodenal Adenoma
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of confocal laser endomicroscopy in pediatric gastrointestinal diseases: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Endoscopic management of tumors of minor ampulla: a multicenter study.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastro-intestinal endoscopy: technical aspects and clinical applications.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Review
- Diagnostic utility of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Risk factors for advanced duodenal and ampullary adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective, single-center study.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
- Surveillance of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis patients: medical objectives and technical requirements.Endoscopy international open · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY
aimsFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is associated with an increased risk of development of periampullary and nonampullary adenoma. Either routine biopsy or endoscopic removal of the lesion is generally required to identify the presence of adenoma. Because the risk of tissue sampling from the ampulla is high and nonampullary polyps are sometimes numerous, resection of all the lesions is time-consuming. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic values of duodenal adenoma by dual focus NBI (dNBI) and probe-based confocal endomicroscopy (pCLE) in FAP patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe authors conducted a diagnostic study in a single tertiary-care referral center. Surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy with dNBI and pCLE was performed on 26 patients with FAP for real-time adenoma diagnosis by two different endoscopists; one used dNBI and the other pCLE. Histology from the matched lesion was used as the gold standard.
resultsA total of 55 matched biopsies (25 ampullas, 30 nonampullas) were performed. The sensitivity, specificity, post predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of dNBI vs. pCLE from all duodenal lesions were 96.9 % vs. 93.8 %, 78.3 % vs. 81 %, 86.1 % vs. 88.2 %, 94.7 vs. 89.5 %, and 92.4 % vs. 88.6 %, respectively.
conclusionsFor surveillance of periampullary and nonampullary adenoma in patients with FAP, the real-time readings provided a high degree of diagnostic value when histology was used as the gold standard. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02162173).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.